Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Different changes, see PR #58 #60

Merged
merged 8 commits into from Apr 14, 2020
Merged

Different changes, see PR #58 #60

merged 8 commits into from Apr 14, 2020

Conversation

ghost
Copy link

@ghost ghost commented Apr 9, 2020

Almost all of this is described in #58 , I tried to make separate commits.
I think that after reviewing it's better to do a squash merge so that this "revert" commit doesn't get into history

@ghost
Copy link
Author

ghost commented Apr 9, 2020

This is almost the same stuff as I had in #58 but without 4->2 indent (it can be done in a separate PR). I may have introduced some new bugs but I tried to not alter the program logic (but I simplified it a bit in some places)

Copy link
Collaborator

@Tangdongle Tangdongle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This all looks good to me. A lot easier to read

@Tangdongle Tangdongle mentioned this pull request Apr 14, 2020
@0atman 0atman merged commit 395f2ff into inim-repl:master Apr 14, 2020
@0atman
Copy link
Collaborator

0atman commented Apr 14, 2020

This is an amazing PR, thank you so much @Yardanico!

I'll get a few more PRs merged today and then cut a release 💪

Thanks @Tangdongle for the review too

0atman added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 14, 2020
 - Massive code cleanup, also fixes 1+1 error (lol) [#60]
 - Added help menu [#55]
 - Rewrite of input functionality, using `noise`, fixes c-d [56]

Many thanks to @Tangdongle and @Yardanico
@timotheecour
Copy link
Contributor

@Yardanico I believe this is causing #63

@0atman
Copy link
Collaborator

0atman commented Apr 14, 2020

I merged without running nimble test, I'm a fraud

@timotheecour
Copy link
Contributor

haha no worries; it's all about setting up automation to remove human errors; no one should have to manually run nimble test before merging :-)

src/inim.nim Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants