Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move async gauge instrumentation as part of initialization #1352

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 13, 2024

Conversation

darwin67
Copy link
Collaborator

@darwin67 darwin67 commented May 13, 2024

Description

The current otel gauge APIs only allow observables, and not sync instrumentation.
Move them to queue initialization instead so we don't attempt to register the callbacks multiple times. Which also contributes to memory growth.

Ref:
https://pkg.go.dev/go.opentelemetry.io/otel/metric#hdr-Measurements

Also add an internal registry to make sure metrics are not registered multiple times.

Type of change (choose one)

  • Chore (refactors, upgrades, etc.)
  • Bug fix (non-breaking change that fixes an issue)
  • Security fix (non-breaking change that fixes a potential vulnerability)
  • Docs
  • New feature (non-breaking change that adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality not to work as expected)

Checklist

  • I've linked any associated issues to this PR.
  • I've tested my own changes.

Check our Pull Request Guidelines

Copy link

vercel bot commented May 13, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

1 Ignored Deployment
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
ui ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview May 13, 2024 4:28pm

@darwin67 darwin67 changed the title Move gauge instrumentation as part of initialization Move async gauge instrumentation as part of initialization May 13, 2024
@darwin67 darwin67 merged commit bda3400 into main May 13, 2024
11 of 12 checks passed
@darwin67 darwin67 deleted the darwin/change-gauge-instrumentation branch May 13, 2024 16:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants