Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update to latest consensus release #392

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Nov 30, 2023
Merged

Update to latest consensus release #392

merged 1 commit into from Nov 30, 2023

Conversation

jasagredo
Copy link
Contributor

@jasagredo jasagredo commented Nov 30, 2023

Changelog

- description: |
    Update to latest `ouroboros-consensus`
    Allow `text-1` for cross compilation on GHC 8.10.7 for aarch64-darwin
# uncomment types applicable to the change:
  type:
  # - feature        # introduces a new feature
  # - breaking       # the API has changed in a breaking way
  # - compatible     # the API has changed but is non-breaking
  # - optimisation   # measurable performance improvements
  # - improvement    # QoL changes e.g. refactoring
  # - bugfix         # fixes a defect
  # - test           # fixes/modifies tests
  # - maintenance    # not directly related to the code
  - release        # related to a new release preparation
  # - documentation  # change in code docs, haddocks...

Context

How to trust this PR

Checklist

  • Commit sequence broadly makes sense and commits have useful messages
  • New tests are added if needed and existing tests are updated. See Running tests for more details
  • Self-reviewed the diff

@carbolymer carbolymer added this pull request to the merge queue Nov 30, 2023
Merged via the queue into main with commit a29d94d Nov 30, 2023
20 checks passed
@carbolymer carbolymer deleted the js/update-consensus branch November 30, 2023 17:59
@@ -40,8 +40,14 @@ common maybe-Win32
if os(windows)
build-depends: Win32

common text
if impl(ghc == 8.10.7) && os(darwin) && arch(aarch64)
Copy link
Contributor

@michaelpj michaelpj Nov 30, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Surely this is worth a comment here too? Also I'm surprised this is different to the bound you put in consensus?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants