Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 9, 2021. It is now read-only.

[#196] Interpret and validate delegation certs #238

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 16, 2019

Conversation

ruhatch
Copy link
Contributor

@ruhatch ruhatch commented Jan 14, 2019

No description provided.

@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ module Ledger.Delegation
, ADELEG
, ADELEGS
, initialDState
, DSEnv (DSEnv)
, DSEnv (..)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we prefer to export things explicitly? My argument for using explicit exports is that we don't export things we don't want inadvertently.

, testGroup
"Properties"
[ testProperty "Activation" dcertsAreTriggered
, testProperty "One delegation per-slot per-key" rejectDupSchedDelegs
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

One issue I see with this alignment is that we'll likely have to change two more lines if we add a third one :)

Copy link
Contributor

@dnadales dnadales left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM.

@ruhatch ruhatch force-pushed the ruhatch/interpret-delegation branch from 69d02c8 to 33e302c Compare January 15, 2019 11:18
@ruhatch ruhatch force-pushed the ruhatch/interpret-delegation branch from 33e302c to 7fe4f88 Compare January 16, 2019 11:38
@ruhatch
Copy link
Contributor Author

ruhatch commented Jan 16, 2019

bors r+

iohk-bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 16, 2019
238: [#196] Interpret and validate delegation certs r=ruhatch a=ruhatch



Co-authored-by: Rupert Horlick <rupert.horlick@iohk.io>
@iohk-bors
Copy link
Contributor

iohk-bors bot commented Jan 16, 2019

@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot merged commit 7fe4f88 into master Jan 16, 2019
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the ruhatch/interpret-delegation branch January 16, 2019 12:15
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants