Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Minor updates to the design spec sections on pool metadata #1507

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Jun 5, 2020

Conversation

dcoutts
Copy link
Contributor

@dcoutts dcoutts commented Jun 1, 2020

A few changes to bring the design spec in line with the actual current
design:

Move the IPs & DNS names from the pool metadata into the pool
registration certificate proper. We decided to move it there to make it
directly (rather than indirectly) accessible to all nodes to allow
using it to bootstrap the P2P network.

Trim the pool metadata fields down to the agreed ones.

Make the description of the stake pool metadata aggregation servers
better reflect the current design.

Copy link
Contributor

@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

A few changes to bring the design spec in line with the actual current
design:

Move the IPs & DNS names from the pool metadata into the pool
registration certificate proper. We decided to move it there to make it
directly (rather than indirectly) accessible to all nodes to allow
using it to bootstrap the P2P network.

Trim the pool metadata fields down to the agreed ones.

Make the description of the stake pool metadata aggregation servers
better reflect the current design.
@JaredCorduan JaredCorduan merged commit 15a818e into master Jun 5, 2020
@iohk-bors iohk-bors bot deleted the dcoutts/spec-pool-metadata branch June 5, 2020 02:10
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants