allow more statistics in cfbt01 template

[clarkliming]

close #551

I feel that cfbt01 is becoming slower....

[github-actions]

🧪 $Test coverage: 97.70%$

Code Coverage Summary

Filename                     Stmts    Miss  Cover    Missing
-------------------------  -------  ------  -------  -------------------------------------------------
R/ael01_nollt.R                 17       1  94.12%   61
R/aet01_aesi.R                 149       1  99.33%   211
R/aet01.R                       94       1  98.94%   158
R/aet02.R                       60       0  100.00%
R/aet03.R                       77       0  100.00%
R/aet04.R                       89       0  100.00%
R/aet05_all.R                   11       0  100.00%
R/aet05.R                       36       1  97.22%   101
R/aet10.R                       43       0  100.00%
R/assertions.R                  99       6  93.94%   88-93
R/cfbt01.R                     104       0  100.00%
R/checks.R                      14       0  100.00%
R/chevron_tlg-S4class.R         18       0  100.00%
R/chevron_tlg-S4methods.R      103       0  100.00%
R/cmt01a.R                      77       0  100.00%
R/coxt01.R                      48       1  97.92%   126
R/dmt01.R                       27       0  100.00%
R/dst01.R                       95       0  100.00%
R/dtht01.R                     103       6  94.17%   48, 52-56
R/egt02.R                       37       0  100.00%
R/egt03.R                       61       1  98.36%   127
R/egt05_qtcat.R                 64       0  100.00%
R/ext01.R                       61       1  98.36%   40
R/fstg01.R                      42       1  97.62%   95
R/kmg01.R                       28       1  96.43%   69
R/lbt04.R                       69       0  100.00%
R/lbt05.R                       67       5  92.54%   125-130
R/lbt06.R                       63       3  95.24%   132-135
R/lbt07.R                       94       0  100.00%
R/lbt14.R                       57       0  100.00%
R/mht01.R                       72       0  100.00%
R/mng01.R                       97       1  98.97%   110
R/pdt01.R                       61       0  100.00%
R/pdt02.R                       69       0  100.00%
R/rmpt01.R                      65      11  83.08%   91-100, 143
R/rspt01.R                      73       3  95.89%   156-159
R/rtables_utils.R              246      17  93.09%   41, 98, 210, 230, 416, 431-433, 435, 453-459, 469
R/standard_rules.R              11       0  100.00%
R/ttet01.R                     129       3  97.67%   229-232
R/utils.R                       54       0  100.00%
R/vst02.R                       47       1  97.87%   107
TOTAL                         2831      65  97.70%

Diff against main

Filename             Stmts    Miss  Cover
-----------------  -------  ------  --------
R/cfbt01.R              +8       0  +100.00%
R/rtables_utils.R       -5       0  -0.14%
R/utils.R               +4       0  +100.00%
TOTAL                   +7       0  +0.01%

Results for commit: a4831a6f59cb441b7683a563330a74992ae1e34a

Minimum allowed coverage is 80%

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results

[github-actions]

Unit Tests Summary

    1 files    49 suites   3m 14s ⏱️
214 tests 157 ✔️   57 💤 0 ❌
432 runs  299 ✔️ 133 💤 0 ❌

Results for commit 958c23a.

♻️ This comment has been updated with latest results.

[BFalquet]

Seems to work for me, although the function is a bit slow, (it was already slow before). Very small comments inside. Thank you for the work. Any comment @barnett11

[clarkliming]

blocked by insightsengineering/tern#983

update: this PR won't be merged in the up coming release so let's do without that PR

[barnett11]

Extra summary statistics seems to be working well, but I'm getting an error if I try to select summaryvars to be just AVAL - a feature of this table should be to have the below,
"Allow user to specify whether display value at visit only, change from baseline only or both value at visit and change from baseline"

[clarkliming]

@barnett11 it is now fixed, could you please have a look?

[barnett11]

@barnett11 it is now fixed, could you please have a look?

Looks perfect thanks!

stale

[BFalquet]

I ll wait for insightsengineering/tern#983 to review since it might impact us.

[clarkliming]

I ll wait for insightsengineering/tern#983 to review since it might impact us.

let's proceed with this because that PR won't be merged in the next release (happenning in sprint 3; date confirmed)

[BFalquet]

Look good to me, I am pleased to see that the baseline and screening are back in the snapshot

[clarkliming]

Look good to me, I am pleased to see that the baseline and screening are back in the snapshot

baseline are removed in the snapshot, screening are not (can be removed through skip)