New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
261 truetype pag new #211
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
261 truetype pag new #211
Conversation
CLA Assistant Lite bot ✅ All contributors have signed the CLA |
I have read the CLA Document and I hereby sign the CLA |
recheck |
@@ -170,19 +174,15 @@ testthat::test_that("pagination: lpp and cpp correctly computed for margins", { | |||
}) | |||
|
|||
testthat::test_that("pagination works with col wrapping", { | |||
lsting <- h_lsting_adae(disp_cols = c("USUBJID", "AESOC", "RACE")) | |||
## This test was predicated and enforcing the extra colgap bug in https://github.com/insightsengineering/formatters/issues/249 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am not sure we can comment code in tests. Probably better to keep it and then change it in the colgap PR
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For reference: insightsengineering/formatters#249
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It doesn't pass which is why it is commented out, I had to fix the referenced formatters bug in order to get everything working. We can't keep it unless we specifically add the bug back into my PR which would be non-trivial (and silly to do)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I can delete it entirely instead of leaving it there commented out if that is preferable
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Could you change it to test that the bug is not present? otherwise we can remove
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a test in the formatters PR for this, is that sufficient? (thats where the bug was and where the issue was filed)
corresponds to insightsengineering/formatters#270
Implements truetype support and updates rlistings for the new formatters version