Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: rename expat checker #3256

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Aug 17, 2023
Merged

Conversation

ffontaine
Copy link
Contributor

Rename expat checker to libexpat to make it more clear that the checker extracts libexpat version

Fix #1694

Rename expat checker to libexpat to make it more clear that the checker
extracts libexpat version

Fix intel#1694

Signed-off-by: Fabrice Fontaine <fabrice.fontaine@orange.com>
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Aug 16, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3256 (e77af91) into main (28fe118) will increase coverage by 0.23%.
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.
The diff coverage is 100.00%.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3256      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   80.94%   81.17%   +0.23%     
==========================================
  Files         724      724              
  Lines       11299    11299              
  Branches     1525     1525              
==========================================
+ Hits         9146     9172      +26     
+ Misses       1740     1719      -21     
+ Partials      413      408       -5     
Flag Coverage Δ
longtests 80.65% <100.00%> (+5.03%) ⬆️
win-longtests 78.91% <100.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

Files Changed Coverage Δ
cve_bin_tool/checkers/__init__.py 91.48% <ø> (ø)
cve_bin_tool/cli.py 67.52% <ø> (+0.57%) ⬆️
test/test_checkers.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
test/test_data/libexpat.py 100.00% <ø> (ø)
cve_bin_tool/checkers/libexpat.py 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)
test/test_cli.py 88.77% <100.00%> (+2.10%) ⬆️

... and 3 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

Copy link
Contributor

@terriko terriko left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I agree that this may make things a bit clearer for folk. Hopefully we won't break any existing tooling/triage with the change but with no way to know I'd rather just do it. Thanks!

@terriko
Copy link
Contributor

terriko commented Aug 16, 2023

BTW, the one python test that failed was (of course) the one that's marked as required. Pretty sure it was just a transient network issue and I'm re-running now. the CVE scans are failing for an unrelated issue that's already being worked on.

@terriko
Copy link
Contributor

terriko commented Aug 17, 2023

Time to get this merged!

@terriko terriko merged commit a3b9dd1 into intel:main Aug 17, 2023
20 of 21 checks passed
@ffontaine ffontaine deleted the rename-expat-checker branch August 17, 2023 21:22
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Discussion: expat and libexpect conflict on checkers
3 participants