Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 5, 2022. It is now read-only.

Backport HCI channel user to 3.10.98 #23

Closed
wants to merge 6 commits into from
Closed

Backport HCI channel user to 3.10.98 #23

wants to merge 6 commits into from

Conversation

roylee17
Copy link

HCI User channel was introduced in 3.14.
It was a important feature for user to implement bluetooth stack in user space.

The handling of the raw socket filter is rather obscure code and it gets
in the way of future extensions. Instead of inline filtering in the raw
socket packet routine, refactor it into its own function.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
The HCI sockets do not have a peer associated with it and so make sure
that getpeername() returns EOPNOTSUPP since this operation is actually
not supported on HCI sockets.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
The hci_dev check is not protected and so move it into the socket lock. In
addition return the HCI channel identifier instead of always 0 channel.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
Even if this is legacy API, there is no reason to not report a proper
error when trying to reset a HCI device that is down.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
The HCI sockets for monitor and control do not support any HCI specific
socket options and if tried, an error will be returned. However the
error used is EINVAL and that is not really descriptive. To make it
clear that these sockets are not handling HCI socket options, return
EBADFD instead.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
The various legacy ioctls used with HCI sockets are limited to raw
channel only. They are not used on the other channels and also have
no meaning there. So return an error if tried to use them.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@holtmann.org>
Signed-off-by: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo.padovan@collabora.co.uk>
@andy-shev
Copy link
Contributor

Why not to use upstream kernel?

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants