Black screen on Windows startup with "kvm [nnnn]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0xfffffnnnnnnnnnn ignored rdmsr: 0xnnn" #79
Comments
|
I had the same issue on a Thinkpad T480s. It works fine on a Windows 10 guest with SeaBIOS. See also: #20 (comment) |
|
@albionxy @daramos , |
|
@daramos: I tried it with BIOS now and it works now. Thank you for that valuable information! S for people who might encounter the same issue: Using BIOS is a good workaround for this issue if one does not have to use UEFI. |
|
@TerrenceXu: It does not work with UEFI + Windows for me. Linux seems to work, however. Can you reproduce the issue with Windows 10 + UEFI on your system? And if yes, is it a regression, or has it never worked yet? |
|
I have same bug but I use desktop with i5-6600 - hd530 and wayland running on rx480. (I use Arch Linux with newest packages). |
|
@tituslabienus @HoshiYamazaki, Looks it is Windows Graphic driver issue, it not support UEFI bios with dma-buf. |
If I remember correctly I had the same issue on legacy BIOS, but I will check it again maybe in this week or next. |
zhenyw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 29, 2019
After commit 5271953 ("rxrpc: Use the UDP encap_rcv hook"), rxrpc_input_packet() is directly called from lockless UDP receive path, under rcu_read_lock() protection. It must therefore use RCU rules : - udp_sk->sk_user_data can be cleared at any point in this function. rcu_dereference_sk_user_data() is what we need here. - Also, since sk_user_data might have been set in rxrpc_open_socket() we must observe a proper RCU grace period before kfree(local) in rxrpc_lookup_local() v4: @Local can be NULL in xrpc_lookup_local() as reported by kbuild test robot <lkp@intel.com> and Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@lip6.fr>, thanks ! v3,v2 : addressed David Howells feedback, thanks ! syzbot reported : kasan: CONFIG_KASAN_INLINE enabled kasan: GPF could be caused by NULL-ptr deref or user memory access general protection fault: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP KASAN CPU: 0 PID: 19236 Comm: syz-executor703 Not tainted 5.1.0-rc6 #79 Hardware name: Google Google Compute Engine/Google Compute Engine, BIOS Google 01/01/2011 RIP: 0010:__lock_acquire+0xbef/0x3fb0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:3573 Code: 00 0f 85 a5 1f 00 00 48 81 c4 10 01 00 00 5b 41 5c 41 5d 41 5e 41 5f 5d c3 48 b8 00 00 00 00 00 fc ff df 4c 89 ea 48 c1 ea 03 <80> 3c 02 00 0f 85 4a 21 00 00 49 81 7d 00 20 54 9c 89 0f 84 cf f4 RSP: 0018:ffff88809d7aef58 EFLAGS: 00010002 RAX: dffffc0000000000 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000 RDX: 0000000000000026 RSI: 0000000000000000 RDI: 0000000000000001 RBP: ffff88809d7af090 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000001 R10: ffffed1015d05bc7 R11: ffff888089428600 R12: 0000000000000000 R13: 0000000000000130 R14: 0000000000000001 R15: 0000000000000001 FS: 00007f059044d700(0000) GS:ffff8880ae800000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000 CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 0000000080050033 CR2: 00000000004b6040 CR3: 00000000955ca000 CR4: 00000000001406f0 Call Trace: lock_acquire+0x16f/0x3f0 kernel/locking/lockdep.c:4211 __raw_spin_lock_irqsave include/linux/spinlock_api_smp.h:110 [inline] _raw_spin_lock_irqsave+0x95/0xcd kernel/locking/spinlock.c:152 skb_queue_tail+0x26/0x150 net/core/skbuff.c:2972 rxrpc_reject_packet net/rxrpc/input.c:1126 [inline] rxrpc_input_packet+0x4a0/0x5536 net/rxrpc/input.c:1414 udp_queue_rcv_one_skb+0xaf2/0x1780 net/ipv4/udp.c:2011 udp_queue_rcv_skb+0x128/0x730 net/ipv4/udp.c:2085 udp_unicast_rcv_skb.isra.0+0xb9/0x360 net/ipv4/udp.c:2245 __udp4_lib_rcv+0x701/0x2ca0 net/ipv4/udp.c:2301 udp_rcv+0x22/0x30 net/ipv4/udp.c:2482 ip_protocol_deliver_rcu+0x60/0x8f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:208 ip_local_deliver_finish+0x23b/0x390 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:234 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:289 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:283 [inline] ip_local_deliver+0x1e9/0x520 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:255 dst_input include/net/dst.h:450 [inline] ip_rcv_finish+0x1e1/0x300 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:413 NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:289 [inline] NF_HOOK include/linux/netfilter.h:283 [inline] ip_rcv+0xe8/0x3f0 net/ipv4/ip_input.c:523 __netif_receive_skb_one_core+0x115/0x1a0 net/core/dev.c:4987 __netif_receive_skb+0x2c/0x1c0 net/core/dev.c:5099 netif_receive_skb_internal+0x117/0x660 net/core/dev.c:5202 napi_frags_finish net/core/dev.c:5769 [inline] napi_gro_frags+0xade/0xd10 net/core/dev.c:5843 tun_get_user+0x2f24/0x3fb0 drivers/net/tun.c:1981 tun_chr_write_iter+0xbd/0x156 drivers/net/tun.c:2027 call_write_iter include/linux/fs.h:1866 [inline] do_iter_readv_writev+0x5e1/0x8e0 fs/read_write.c:681 do_iter_write fs/read_write.c:957 [inline] do_iter_write+0x184/0x610 fs/read_write.c:938 vfs_writev+0x1b3/0x2f0 fs/read_write.c:1002 do_writev+0x15e/0x370 fs/read_write.c:1037 __do_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1110 [inline] __se_sys_writev fs/read_write.c:1107 [inline] __x64_sys_writev+0x75/0xb0 fs/read_write.c:1107 do_syscall_64+0x103/0x610 arch/x86/entry/common.c:290 entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x49/0xbe Fixes: 5271953 ("rxrpc: Use the UDP encap_rcv hook") Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Reported-by: syzbot <syzkaller@googlegroups.com> Acked-by: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
|
@TerrenceXu Does dma-buf + Uefi + Windows work now? |
zhenyw
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 11, 2020
Stefan reported a strange kernel fault which turned out to be due to a missing KUAP disable in flush_coherent_icache() called from flush_icache_range(). The fault looks like: Kernel attempted to access user page (7fffc30d9c00) - exploit attempt? (uid: 1009) BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access on read at 0x7fffc30d9c00 Faulting instruction address: 0xc00000000007232c Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1] LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Radix SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA PowerNV CPU: 35 PID: 5886 Comm: sigtramp Not tainted 5.6.0-rc2-gcc-8.2.0-00003-gfc37a1632d40 #79 NIP: c00000000007232c LR: c00000000003b7fc CTR: 0000000000000000 REGS: c000001e11093940 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted (5.6.0-rc2-gcc-8.2.0-00003-gfc37a1632d40) MSR: 900000000280b033 <SF,HV,VEC,VSX,EE,FP,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 28000884 XER: 00000000 CFAR: c0000000000722fc DAR: 00007fffc30d9c00 DSISR: 08000000 IRQMASK: 0 GPR00: c00000000003b7fc c000001e11093bd0 c0000000023ac200 00007fffc30d9c00 GPR04: 00007fffc30d9c18 0000000000000000 c000001e11093bd4 0000000000000000 GPR08: 0000000000000000 0000000000000001 0000000000000000 c000001e1104ed80 GPR12: 0000000000000000 c000001fff6ab380 c0000000016be2d0 4000000000000000 GPR16: c000000000000000 bfffffffffffffff 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 GPR20: 00007fffc30d9c00 00007fffc30d8f58 00007fffc30d9c18 00007fffc30d9c20 GPR24: 00007fffc30d9c18 0000000000000000 c000001e11093d90 c000001e1104ed80 GPR28: c000001e11093e90 0000000000000000 c0000000023d9d18 00007fffc30d9c00 NIP flush_icache_range+0x5c/0x80 LR handle_rt_signal64+0x95c/0xc2c Call Trace: 0xc000001e11093d90 (unreliable) handle_rt_signal64+0x93c/0xc2c do_notify_resume+0x310/0x430 ret_from_except_lite+0x70/0x74 Instruction dump: 409e002c 7c0802a6 3c62ff31 3863f6a0 f8010080 48195fed 60000000 48fe4c8d 60000000 e8010080 7c0803a6 7c0004ac <7c00ffac> 7c0004ac 4c00012c 38210070 This path through handle_rt_signal64() to setup_trampoline() and flush_icache_range() is only triggered by 64-bit processes that have unmapped their VDSO, which is rare. flush_icache_range() takes a range of addresses to flush. In flush_coherent_icache() we implement an optimisation for CPUs where we know we don't actually have to flush the whole range, we just need to do a single icbi. However we still execute the icbi on the user address of the start of the range we're flushing. On CPUs that also implement KUAP (Power9) that leads to the spurious fault above. We should be able to pass any address, including a kernel address, to the icbi on these CPUs, which would avoid any interaction with KUAP. But I don't want to make that change in a bug fix, just in case it surfaces some strange behaviour on some CPU. So for now just disable KUAP around the icbi. Note the icbi is treated as a load, so we allow read access, not write as you'd expect. Fixes: 890274c ("powerpc/64s: Implement KUAP for Radix MMU") Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # v5.2+ Reported-by: Stefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200303235708.26004-1-mpe@ellerman.id.au
zhiwang1
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Apr 13, 2022
…e_zone
btrfs_can_activate_zone() can be called with the device_list_mutex already
held, which will lead to a deadlock:
insert_dev_extents() // Takes device_list_mutex
`-> insert_dev_extent()
`-> btrfs_insert_empty_item()
`-> btrfs_insert_empty_items()
`-> btrfs_search_slot()
`-> btrfs_cow_block()
`-> __btrfs_cow_block()
`-> btrfs_alloc_tree_block()
`-> btrfs_reserve_extent()
`-> find_free_extent()
`-> find_free_extent_update_loop()
`-> can_allocate_chunk()
`-> btrfs_can_activate_zone() // Takes device_list_mutex again
Instead of using the RCU on fs_devices->device_list we
can use fs_devices->alloc_list, protected by the chunk_mutex to traverse
the list of active devices.
We are in the chunk allocation thread. The newer chunk allocation
happens from the devices in the fs_device->alloc_list protected by the
chunk_mutex.
btrfs_create_chunk()
lockdep_assert_held(&info->chunk_mutex);
gather_device_info
list_for_each_entry(device, &fs_devices->alloc_list, dev_alloc_list)
Also, a device that reappears after the mount won't join the alloc_list
yet and, it will be in the dev_list, which we don't want to consider in
the context of the chunk alloc.
[15.166572] WARNING: possible recursive locking detected
[15.167117] 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79 Not tainted
[15.167487] --------------------------------------------
[15.167733] kworker/u8:3/146 is trying to acquire lock:
[15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.167733]
[15.167733] but task is already holding lock:
[15.167733] ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.167733]
[15.167733] other info that might help us debug this:
[15.167733] Possible unsafe locking scenario:
[15.167733]
[15.171834] CPU0
[15.171834] ----
[15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[15.171834] lock(&fs_devs->device_list_mutex);
[15.171834]
[15.171834] *** DEADLOCK ***
[15.171834]
[15.171834] May be due to missing lock nesting notation
[15.171834]
[15.171834] 5 locks held by kworker/u8:3/146:
[15.171834] #0: ffff888100050938 ((wq_completion)events_unbound){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
[15.171834] #1: ffffc9000067be80 ((work_completion)(&fs_info->async_data_reclaim_work)){+.+.}-{0:0}, at: process_one_work+0x1c3/0x5a0
[15.176244] #2: ffff88810521e620 (sb_internal){.+.+}-{0:0}, at: flush_space+0x335/0x600 [btrfs]
[15.176244] #3: ffff888102962ee0 (&fs_devs->device_list_mutex){+.+.}-{3:3}, at: btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x20a/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.176244] #4: ffff8881152e4b78 (btrfs-dev-00){++++}-{3:3}, at: __btrfs_tree_lock+0x27/0x130 [btrfs]
[15.179641]
[15.179641] stack backtrace:
[15.179641] CPU: 1 PID: 146 Comm: kworker/u8:3 Not tainted 5.17.0-rc6-dennis #79
[15.179641] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS 1.15.0-1.fc35 04/01/2014
[15.179641] Workqueue: events_unbound btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space [btrfs]
[15.179641] Call Trace:
[15.179641] <TASK>
[15.179641] dump_stack_lvl+0x45/0x59
[15.179641] __lock_acquire.cold+0x217/0x2b2
[15.179641] lock_acquire+0xbf/0x2b0
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] __mutex_lock+0x8e/0x970
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
[15.183838] ? find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] find_free_extent+0x15a/0x14f0 [btrfs]
[15.183838] ? _raw_spin_unlock+0x24/0x40
[15.183838] ? btrfs_get_alloc_profile+0x106/0x230 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_reserve_extent+0x131/0x260 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_alloc_tree_block+0xb5/0x3b0 [btrfs]
[15.187601] __btrfs_cow_block+0x138/0x600 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_cow_block+0x10f/0x230 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_search_slot+0x55f/0xbc0 [btrfs]
[15.187601] ? lock_is_held_type+0xd7/0x130
[15.187601] btrfs_insert_empty_items+0x2d/0x60 [btrfs]
[15.187601] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x2b3/0x560 [btrfs]
[15.187601] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x36/0x2a0 [btrfs]
[15.192037] flush_space+0x374/0x600 [btrfs]
[15.192037] ? find_held_lock+0x2b/0x80
[15.192037] ? btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x49/0x180 [btrfs]
[15.192037] ? lock_release+0x131/0x2b0
[15.192037] btrfs_async_reclaim_data_space+0x70/0x180 [btrfs]
[15.192037] process_one_work+0x24c/0x5a0
[15.192037] worker_thread+0x4a/0x3d0
Fixes: a85f05e ("btrfs: zoned: avoid chunk allocation if active block group has enough space")
CC: stable@vger.kernel.org # 5.16+
Reviewed-by: Anand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
I have build the staging branch, and now it runs on my Coffee Lake host with a Linux client pretty well. Thank you for the great work. 😊
However, I cannot get the Windows guest to work. The GPU was correctly recognized as UHD 630, after the Intel driver 25.20.10.6577, which was the only one listed on the Intel webpage as being compatible with the i7 8750H model, had been installed. Running the Windows 10 x64 UEFI client with the same host configuration as for the Linux guest does not give any display output when vga=none is set, however. The client does boot though, as I could verify via ssh/vnc. Dmesg on the host shows several error messages in the same format, which appear just after the client startup has been triggered (compare DmesgBeforeWin10Start.txt with DmesgAfterWin10Start.txt):
[ 105.806639] kvm [5630]: vcpu0, guest rIP: 0xfffff80123de62dc ignored rdmsr: 0x611This behaviour is reproducible every time on my system. My startup script is an adapted UEFI version of the example for dma-buf with GTK (see StartWin10Guest.txt).
Did I install the right driver version, or is there another one I should try instead?
Host System:
System: Thinkpad P72
OS: Arch Linux
CPU: Coffee Lake (i7-8750H)
GPU: Optimus system with UHD Graphics 630 + Quadro P600
Driver: xf86-video-intel 1:2.99.917+860+g3a2dec17-1 nvidia-dkms 418.43-4
Branch: gvt-staging (built 03.03.19)
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: