Use the proper grammar for path fragments in macro_rules! #5359
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Wow, nice catch! 👍 Thanks! Please, bump |
|
bors r+ |
|
@mrobakowski Welcome to IntelliJ Rust contributors! |
|
@Undin glad to be here. This project makes my life so much easier, so I'm happy I could help even a little bit ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR changes the grammar used by the macro expander to match on
pathfragments. The Rust Reference specifies that a path fragment should be parsed as a type-like path:Before this PR value-like paths were used, which caused some macros to fail to expand.
Closes #5357