Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

REF: Import types after Extract Function refactoring #6893

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Mar 22, 2021

Conversation

mchernyavsky
Copy link
Member

changelog: Import unresolved types from the function signature after Extract Function refactoring

@mchernyavsky mchernyavsky added the fix Pull requests that fix some bug(s) label Feb 26, 2021
@Undin Undin added feature and removed fix Pull requests that fix some bug(s) labels Feb 26, 2021
Copy link
Member

@artemmukhin artemmukhin left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member Author

@mchernyavsky mchernyavsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r=ortem

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
6893: REF: Import types after Extract Function refactoring r=ortem a=mchernyavsky

<!--
Hello and thank you for the pull request!

We don't have any strict rules about pull requests, but you might check
https://github.com/intellij-rust/intellij-rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
for some hints!

Note that we need an electronic CLA for contributions:
https://github.com/intellij-rust/intellij-rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#cla

After you sign the CLA, please add your name to
https://github.com/intellij-rust/intellij-rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.txt

Also, please write a short description explaining your change in the following format: `changelog: %description%`
This description will help a lot to create release changelog. 
Drop these lines for internal only changes

:)
-->

changelog: Import unresolved types from the function signature after `Extract Function` refactoring


Co-authored-by: mchernyavsky <chernyavsky.mikhail@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Mar 22, 2021

Build failed:

Copy link
Member Author

@mchernyavsky mchernyavsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors retry

bors bot added a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 22, 2021
6893: REF: Import types after Extract Function refactoring r=ortem a=mchernyavsky

<!--
Hello and thank you for the pull request!

We don't have any strict rules about pull requests, but you might check
https://github.com/intellij-rust/intellij-rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
for some hints!

Note that we need an electronic CLA for contributions:
https://github.com/intellij-rust/intellij-rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md#cla

After you sign the CLA, please add your name to
https://github.com/intellij-rust/intellij-rust/blob/master/CONTRIBUTORS.txt

Also, please write a short description explaining your change in the following format: `changelog: %description%`
This description will help a lot to create release changelog. 
Drop these lines for internal only changes

:)
-->

changelog: Import unresolved types from the function signature after `Extract Function` refactoring


Co-authored-by: mchernyavsky <chernyavsky.mikhail@gmail.com>
@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Mar 22, 2021

Build failed:

Copy link
Member Author

@mchernyavsky mchernyavsky left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

bors r=ortem

@bors
Copy link
Contributor

bors bot commented Mar 22, 2021

Build succeeded:

@bors bors bot merged commit 7f06bfd into master Mar 22, 2021
@bors bors bot deleted the import-extract-function branch March 22, 2021 13:40
@github-actions github-actions bot added this to the v144 milestone Mar 22, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants