fix: autopeering - use localtunnel

[sabineschaller]

Changes proposed in this pull request

I only swap out tunnelmole and now use localtunnel. The additional interaction is only required when accessing the localtunnel url through the browser. Hence, our API requests work fine.
Right now, the localtunnel "login" screen is shown when going through the consent flow. We could get around even that when we make the Rafiki.money user the sender and the local user the receiver. However, since Rafiki.money is not on the latest version of Rafiki, the polling interaction flow does not work yet.

Context

Even though it's not the same, it

• fixes Host own tunnelmole server #2420
• fixes host our own tunnelmole instance #2571
• fixes let autopeering use our own tunnelmole instance #2572

Checklist

• Related issues linked using fixes #number
• Tests added/updated
• Documentation added
• Make sure that all checks pass
• Bruno collection updated

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for brilliant-pasca-3e80ec ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	59f8ad4
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/brilliant-pasca-3e80ec/deploys/6617a2d93ed2730008638886
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-2633--brilliant-pasca-3e80ec.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[mkurapov]

I was able to send a payment from local env -> rafiki.money, but like you mention in the description, not the other way around.
However, do you think it would be better for rafiki.money to properly use the redirect step? that would seem to be a better experience than getting a blank page with "200 - Accepted" on it

[mkurapov]

My first time running this I got pretty aggressive auto-generated URLs:

[sabineschaller]

I was able to send a payment from local env -> rafiki.money, but like you mention in the description, not the other way around.
However, do you think it would be better for rafiki.money to properly use the redirect step? that would seem to be a better experience than getting a blank page with "200 - Accepted" on it

I'm not sure I follow

[mkurapov]

@sabineschaller
Sorry, not clear wording

When we are approving the grant request in rafiki.money, I think it would be better to use the grant initiation flow with the finish object (meaning, with interact_ref), since then we can get redirected to a proper page in rafiki.money (with finish.uri), instead of just seeing a blank html page with "Accepted 200".

[sabineschaller]

@mkurapov

When we are approving the grant request in rafiki.money, I think it would be better to use the grant initiation flow with the finish object (meaning, with interact_ref), since then we can get redirected to a proper page in rafiki.money (with finish.uri), instead of just seeing a blank html page with "Accepted 200".

But what would that page be?

[mkurapov]

@sabineschaller yeah I think I confused myself there 😅 , this is from bruno