-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 276
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
feature/go-pfmon #5613
feature/go-pfmon #5613
Conversation
ef92e49
to
77475e4
Compare
ed5b50e
to
2036276
Compare
2036276
to
3928800
Compare
5fd4ccb
to
af64a79
Compare
One general comment I have about this is that the new binary shouldn't be called pfmaint since it can easily be confused with pf-maint.pl We should keep the name pfmon |
Does the new pfmon binary is aware of the tasks it can run on all cluster members versus some of them who needs to run on only one server ? |
No, I will add support for running on only the master server since that is the current behavior of pfmon. |
fdef9c7
to
dd0b642
Compare
It now only runs on the master in the cluster. |
6d2a352
to
25ba88b
Compare
After this one is merged, will |
4c150f2
to
7baa98d
Compare
@@ -67,71 +67,8 @@ pf::cmd::pf::pfmon | |||
|
|||
use strict; | |||
use warnings; | |||
use pf::config::pfmon qw(%ConfigPfmon); |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why not just remove the file ?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I left it for backward compatibility of cron jobs.
30c4e89
to
33f61c6
Compare
Please rereview |
import ( | ||
"testing" | ||
) | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Does it make sense to test an expired certificate ?
There is still references to pfmon in the code.
What do we do with that ? |
@jrouzierinverse Advised on Fabrice's last comment and let's wrap this up once for all. |
3b119e4
to
457f34b
Compare
Please re-review |
On my side it looks ok, i let keep @julsemaan doing a last shot. |
My comments were marked as resolved so I'm fine with this being merged |
Description
A go based pfmon
NEWS file entries
New Features
Delete branch after merge
NO
Checklist
Upgrade Instructions
Rename PFMON -> PFCRON
/usr/local/pf/bin/addons/upgrade/to-10.2-adminroles-conf.pl