Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add edge.yaml support + supabase config #27

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Jun 30, 2023

Conversation

gaetschwartz
Copy link
Contributor

@gaetschwartz gaetschwartz commented Apr 18, 2023

This PR adds suuport for a config file called edge.yaml. It should be pretty modular, tell me what are your thoughts about it ;)

Also fixes #23, #24

Notes

This adds dependencies over freezed and build_runner. I figured it wouldn't be an issue as it's a CLI and not a package people would really depend on.

@CLAassistant
Copy link

CLAassistant commented Apr 18, 2023

CLA assistant check
All committers have signed the CLA.

@Salakar Salakar requested review from Ehesp and Salakar June 12, 2023 12:15
@Fraa-124
Copy link

The idea of creating a separate project for each function is not something I'm implementing. This pull request is greatly appreciated, thank you

@Ehesp
Copy link
Member

Ehesp commented Jun 27, 2023

@gaetschwartz Sorry about taking so long on this. I've just made some small changes and added some docs. I've tested it out locally and seems to work well, thanks. Let me know if you think the docs match what you've done here and I'll get it published.

@gaetschwartz
Copy link
Contributor Author

Looks good to me ! I'm already working on improving usability of the configuration and more, will push a PR soon !

@Ehesp Ehesp changed the title Add configuration feat: add edge.yaml support + supabase config Jun 30, 2023
@Ehesp Ehesp merged commit 8134137 into invertase:main Jun 30, 2023
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Multiple functions support ?
4 participants