Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Extract a common "values" area type #1

Closed
io7m opened this issue Mar 8, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Extract a common "values" area type #1

io7m opened this issue Mar 8, 2017 · 0 comments
Assignees

Comments

@io7m
Copy link
Member

io7m commented Mar 8, 2017

APIs such as jcanephora need to be able to work with area types regardless of whether the concrete implementation is a PArea or plain Area. In other words, right now an API such as jcanephora will end up forcing the user to use either PAreas or Areas even though the types are functionally identical.

@io7m io7m self-assigned this Mar 8, 2017
@io7m io7m changed the title Extra a common "values" area type Extract a common "values" area type Mar 8, 2017
@io7m io7m closed this as completed in cac8754 Mar 8, 2017
io7m added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2017
Release: jregions 0.0.3
Code new: Add common "value" interfaces. (tickets: #1)
Code new: Add missing float and BigDecimal generators and tests. (tickets: #4)
Code new: Add type conversion methods. (tickets: #3)
Code new: Allow areas to be treated as area sizes. (tickets: #5)
Code new: Add methods to return sizes from areas. (tickets: #2)
io7m added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 10, 2017
Release: jregions 0.0.3

Code new: Add common "value" interfaces. (tickets: #1)
Code new: Add missing float and BigDecimal generators and tests. (tickets: #4)
Code new: Add type conversion methods. (tickets: #3)
Code new: Allow areas to be treated as area sizes. (tickets: #5)
Code new: Add methods to return sizes from areas. (tickets: #2)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant