You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
APIs such as jcanephora need to be able to work with area types regardless of whether the concrete implementation is a PArea or plain Area. In other words, right now an API such as jcanephora will end up forcing the user to use either PAreas or Areas even though the types are functionally identical.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Release: jregions 0.0.3
Code new: Add common "value" interfaces. (tickets: #1)
Code new: Add missing float and BigDecimal generators and tests. (tickets: #4)
Code new: Add type conversion methods. (tickets: #3)
Code new: Allow areas to be treated as area sizes. (tickets: #5)
Code new: Add methods to return sizes from areas. (tickets: #2)
Release: jregions 0.0.3
Code new: Add common "value" interfaces. (tickets: #1)
Code new: Add missing float and BigDecimal generators and tests. (tickets: #4)
Code new: Add type conversion methods. (tickets: #3)
Code new: Allow areas to be treated as area sizes. (tickets: #5)
Code new: Add methods to return sizes from areas. (tickets: #2)
APIs such as
jcanephora
need to be able to work with area types regardless of whether the concrete implementation is aPArea
or plainArea
. In other words, right now an API such asjcanephora
will end up forcing the user to use eitherPAreas
orAreas
even though the types are functionally identical.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: