Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Change bug status in 1992/gson #2554

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024
Merged

Change bug status in 1992/gson #2554

merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2024

Conversation

xexyl
Copy link

@xexyl xexyl commented Jul 9, 2024

An additional look shows that the gets(3) call is for the dictionary
file. It is highly unlikely (though not impossible) that the dictionary
file would ever have a line 256 in length and this as well as because it
was documented is why I changed the buffer size back to the original.

The bug status does still suggest it would be nice if fgets(3) could be
used but it also lists the bugs and limitations the author stated in the
first place which actually does refer to the 256 limit.

I moved the notice to those who want a challenge up a bit in the
README.md file to be right above obfuscatory notes rather than before
those notes get into the details.

xexyl added 3 commits July 9, 2024 04:51
Removed extraneous </p>.
This was caused because I had accidentally put a leftbar class before
the '*' rather than on the same line (after it). This commit should fix
it.
An additional look shows that the gets(3) call is for the dictionary
file. It is highly unlikely (though not impossible) that the dictionary
file would ever have a line 256 in length and this as well as because it
was documented is why I changed the buffer size back to the original.

The bug status does still suggest it would be nice if fgets(3) could be
used but it also lists the bugs and limitations the author stated in the
first place which actually does refer to the 256 limit.

I moved the notice to those who want a challenge up a bit in the
README.md file to be right above obfuscatory notes rather than before
those notes get into the details.
@xexyl
Copy link
Author

xexyl commented Jul 9, 2024

Have to go for a bit .. when back I'll be doing more on the 'challenge' notes .. then hopefully I can finish the most recent issue and then go from there.

I forgot to say that this commit also fixes some format problems in the index.html file.

Copy link

@lcn2 lcn2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for this update @xexyl

@lcn2 lcn2 merged commit f2d6303 into ioccc-src:master Jul 9, 2024
1 check passed
@xexyl
Copy link
Author

xexyl commented Jul 9, 2024

Thank you for this update @xexyl

Welcome .. afk a bit longer and then I hope to do more.

@xexyl xexyl deleted the gson92-bugs branch July 9, 2024 16:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants