450 generate schemaorg to prov mapping

[pbuttigieg]

Addressing #450

A GSheet to make the mapping editing easier, here.

[pbuttigieg]

The core PROV terms (what are referred to as Starting Point terms) are mostly covered.

I'm not convinced that adding the Expanded terms or the Qualified terms is really wise - these, especially the Qualified terms, look like PROV got carried away with itself. The semantics are either better handed by generic models like schema.org, or are convoluted. There may be a way to map via potentialActions, however.

[pbuttigieg]

The Expanded terms are actually reasonably mappable. But things like Collections etc are not appropriate in the PROV domain - this is mission creep on PROV's part. The same is true for Person, Organization, etc. We can still map it I suppsoe, but this is by no means a vote of confidence of such terms.

[pbuttigieg]

xref ESIPFed/science-on-schema.org#211

@ashepherd I think ProvONE has the same issues of mission creep as the expanded and qualifying PROV terms. We can still map, but I think the PROV realm is reinventing things unnecessarily.

[pbuttigieg]

@matentzn this may be interesting to you, and a quick check of this SSSOM would be appreciated.