Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Aug 16, 2022. It is now read-only.

Reconciliation Proposal 讨论 #116

Closed
fengmk2 opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 29 comments
Closed

Reconciliation Proposal 讨论 #116

fengmk2 opened this issue Feb 27, 2015 · 29 comments

Comments

@fengmk2
Copy link
Contributor

fengmk2 commented Feb 27, 2015

一旦 nodejs/node#978 定案,我们需要投票是否迁移到 Node 项目下面去。

All io.js language community working groups (32 individual teams by last count) will vote to
move to the Node project where they would continue to be endpoints for community members to
collaborate with each other in their language of choice and produce localizations of project resources.

@fengmk2
Copy link
Contributor Author

fengmk2 commented Feb 27, 2015

我个人观点:如果还是 joyent/node,我是不想这样做的。必须是 nodejs/node,或者 node-foundation/node

@liuyanghejerry
Copy link

+1

@guo-yu
Copy link
Contributor

guo-yu commented Feb 27, 2015

joyent 这方的立场呢?

@haoxins
Copy link

haoxins commented Feb 27, 2015

必须是 nodejs/node,或者 node-foundation/node

+1

但貌似不太容易

@mattma
Copy link
Contributor

mattma commented Feb 27, 2015

+1 我最近去了 Node Summit 会议,看到了两方的立场。我认为 Joyent 一定要拥有 Node.js trademark. 这个不可能改变。他们是商人,是以赚钱为主。因为现在大多数的码农都去了 io.js, 他们也是没有什么办法。

从 io.js 这方面看,Rodd 和 Ben 根本没有和他们谈的余地,所以短时间合并的可能性是 0. 大家大可放心好了。没有人会继续同意 joyent/node. 我支持 @fengmk2 说的。

@fengmk2
Copy link
Contributor Author

fengmk2 commented Feb 27, 2015

@amio
Copy link

amio commented Feb 27, 2015

拥有 Node.js 商标可以授权给 Node 基金会使用嘛,也不是不可解决的冲突,如果双方都有积极意愿的话。

@zhuangya
Copy link
Contributor

+1

1 similar comment
@teabyii
Copy link

teabyii commented Feb 27, 2015

+1

@booxood
Copy link

booxood commented Feb 28, 2015

必须是 nodejs/node,或者 node-foundation/node

+1,别又闹分离

@XadillaX
Copy link
Member

我个人观点:如果还是 joyent/node,我是不想这样做的。必须是 nodejs/node,或者 node-foundation/node

+1

1 similar comment
@nunnly
Copy link

nunnly commented Feb 28, 2015

我个人观点:如果还是 joyent/node,我是不想这样做的。必须是 nodejs/node,或者 node-foundation/node

+1

@gxcsoccer
Copy link

+1

3 similar comments
@xieren58
Copy link

+1

@sushi90
Copy link

sushi90 commented Mar 12, 2015

+1

@taofengno1
Copy link

+1

@lisposter
Copy link
Contributor

总觉得合并了 Ben 又不干了

@xieren58
Copy link

其实io.js挺好,貌似没必要合并。。。都准备切换到io.js

@fengmk2
Copy link
Contributor Author

fengmk2 commented Mar 12, 2015

@lisposter 哪里的新闻?

@XadillaX
Copy link
Member

@fengmk2 他的主观吐槽吧?

@lisposter
Copy link
Contributor

@fengmk2 个人感觉

@JacksonTian
Copy link

我的建议是 contributor在哪里我就支持哪里。

@yuanzhij
Copy link

我想知道到底怎么个合法。

@gxmari007
Copy link

+1

@channely
Copy link

io+=1

@ycalm
Copy link

ycalm commented Mar 18, 2015

+1

1 similar comment
@DavidCai1111
Copy link
Member

+1

@laosb
Copy link

laosb commented May 16, 2015

+1

@fengmk2
Copy link
Contributor Author

fengmk2 commented May 16, 2015

Now we all in https://github.com/nodejs

@fengmk2 fengmk2 closed this as completed May 16, 2015
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests