Operator Api | Refine operator models #128
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
tom-ioki
force-pushed
the
refine-operator-models
branch
2 times, most recently
from
65ada26
to
3bbf211
Compare
ferdicus
approved these changes
Sep 20, 2022
tom-ioki
force-pushed
the
refine-operator-models
branch
from
3bbf211
to
0236c27
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
As I was working with the new LeightweightSchema I found some inconsistencies between the ioki-ruby operator models and the schemas in triebwerk. This PR will clear these inconsistencies.