Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

build contract staking indexer only when staking protocol enabled #3886

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Aug 1, 2023

Conversation

envestcc
Copy link
Member

Description

Currently, the usage of the contract stake indexer is limited to the staking module. Therefore, if the staking protocol is not enabled, there is no need to create the indexer.

Fixes #(issue)

Type of change

Please delete options that are not relevant.

  • [] Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • [] New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Code refactor or improvement
  • [] Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause a new or changed behavior of existing functionality)
  • [] This change requires a documentation update

How Has This Been Tested?

Please describe the tests that you ran to verify your changes. Provide instructions so we can reproduce. Please also list any relevant details for your test configuration

  • make test
  • [] fullsync
  • [] Other test (please specify)

Test Configuration:

  • Firmware version:
  • Hardware:
  • Toolchain:
  • SDK:

Checklist:

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • I have performed a self-review of my code
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas
  • I have made corresponding changes to the documentation
  • My changes generate no new warnings
  • I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
  • New and existing unit tests pass locally with my changes
  • Any dependent changes have been merged and published in downstream modules

@envestcc envestcc requested a review from a team as a code owner June 12, 2023 03:39
@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jun 12, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jun 12, 2023

Codecov Report

Merging #3886 (e0bf969) into master (e1f0636) will increase coverage by 0.67%.
Report is 75 commits behind head on master.
The diff coverage is 73.19%.

❗ Current head e0bf969 differs from pull request most recent head 8dcce8f. Consider uploading reports for the commit 8dcce8f to get more accurate results

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3886      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   75.38%   76.05%   +0.67%     
==========================================
  Files         303      327      +24     
  Lines       25923    27855    +1932     
==========================================
+ Hits        19541    21186    +1645     
- Misses       5360     5578     +218     
- Partials     1022     1091      +69     
Files Changed Coverage Δ
action/protocol/execution/evm/evm.go 43.52% <0.00%> (-2.95%) ⬇️
action/protocol/execution/evm/evmstatedbadapter.go 66.77% <ø> (ø)
action/protocol/poll/consortium.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
action/protocol/poll/staking_committee.go 43.85% <0.00%> (ø)
...tion/protocol/staking/contractstake_bucket_type.go 0.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/grpcserver.go 86.40% <0.00%> (ø)
api/loglistener.go 25.00% <0.00%> (ø)
api/web3server_marshal.go 93.21% <ø> (ø)
api/websocket.go 4.10% <0.00%> (-1.07%) ⬇️
blockchain/config.go 74.54% <ø> (ø)
... and 53 more

... and 5 files with indirect coverage changes

📣 We’re building smart automated test selection to slash your CI/CD build times. Learn more

@@ -298,6 +298,9 @@ func (builder *Builder) buildSGDRegistry(forTest bool) error {
}

func (builder *Builder) buildContractStakingIndexer(forTest bool) error {
if !builder.cfg.Chain.EnableStakingProtocol {
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

will contractStakingIndexer be nil when enabled?

Copy link
Member

@dustinxie dustinxie Aug 1, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

in theory it could be, if cfg.Genesis.SystemStakingContractAddress == "" in the config
in prod, the contract address is valid, and contractStakingIndexer will be created

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should ContractStakingIndexer be built when cfg.Genesis.SystemStakingContractAddress == ""

Copy link
Member

@dustinxie dustinxie Aug 1, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

no, in that case, means SystemStaking (IIP-13) is not enabled on the chain, no need to build the indexer

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 1, 2023

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!    Quality Gate passed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
0.0% 0.0% Duplication

@dustinxie dustinxie merged commit 6625a4c into iotexproject:master Aug 1, 2023
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants