Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

libbpf-tools/cpudist: Allow cpudist to run on old kernels #4338

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 26, 2022

Conversation

woodpenker
Copy link
Contributor

According to #4231

Test OK on Ubuntu 20.04 with 5.4.0-97-generic kernel like this:

$ sudo ./cpudist  
libbpf: sched_switch is not found in vmlinux BTF
Tracing on-CPU time... Hit Ctrl-C to end.
^C
     usecs               : count    distribution
         0 -> 1          : 5        |**                                      |
         2 -> 3          : 6        |**                                      |
         4 -> 7          : 14       |*****                                   |
         8 -> 15         : 22       |*********                               |
        16 -> 31         : 29       |************                            |
        32 -> 63         : 28       |***********                             |
        64 -> 127        : 51       |*********************                   |
       128 -> 255        : 15       |******                                  |
       256 -> 511        : 17       |*******                                 |
       512 -> 1023       : 29       |************                            |
      1024 -> 2047       : 67       |****************************            |
      2048 -> 4095       : 89       |*************************************   |
      4096 -> 8191       : 90       |*************************************   |
      8192 -> 16383      : 95       |****************************************|

@@ -71,8 +71,7 @@ static __always_inline void update_hist(struct task_struct *task,
histp = bpf_map_lookup_elem(&hists, &id);
if (!histp)
return;
bpf_probe_read_kernel_str(&histp->comm, sizeof(task->comm),
task->comm);
BPF_CORE_READ_STR_INTO(&histp->comm, task, comm);
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

this and below BPF_CORE_READ will actually call kernel helpers instead of direct memory access. But I understand this is necessary for raw_tp. I think it is okay for portability perspective. We have quite a few tools still using kprobe which uses BPF_CORE_READ as well.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the review, do you mean this will have a latency cost to use BPF_CORE_READ instead of direct mem access? Maybe another way is to separate each other with independent functions containing the same logic?

@yonghong-song yonghong-song merged commit 957569f into iovisor:master Nov 26, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants