Add retpoline mitigation for x86-64 Linux indirect calls #315
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hawkinsw
force-pushed
the
linux_x86_64_retpolines
branch
4 times, most recently
from
ead37a5
to
0a0a94c
Compare
Alan-Jowett
reviewed
Jul 19, 2023
Alan-Jowett
approved these changes
Jul 19, 2023
hawkinsw
force-pushed
the
linux_x86_64_retpolines
branch
from
0a0a94c
to
1132f40
Compare
|
What changed in bpf_conformance for this? |
Spectre/Meltdown lurk where indirect calls are used. Let's protect against the badness if we can. Signed-off-by: Will Hawkins <hawkinsw@obs.cr>
hawkinsw
force-pushed
the
linux_x86_64_retpolines
branch
from
1132f40
to
9d2a7b7
Compare
Mistake! Should be sorted in the newest version! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Spectre/Meltdown lurk where indirect calls are used. Let's protect against the badness if we can.