Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Dockerfile: should allow to run cluster only and not ipfs daemon #197

Closed
hsanjuan opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 0 comments
Closed

Dockerfile: should allow to run cluster only and not ipfs daemon #197

hsanjuan opened this issue Oct 25, 2017 · 0 comments
Labels
exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up

Comments

@hsanjuan
Copy link
Collaborator

Via environment variable START_IPFS=no for example.
@hsanjuan hsanjuan added exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up status/ready Ready to be worked labels Oct 25, 2017
@hsanjuan hsanjuan added this to the User feedback and bugs [Q4O3] milestone Oct 25, 2017
@hsanjuan hsanjuan mentioned this issue Oct 25, 2017
Open
hsanjuan added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 23, 2017
@hsanjuan
Dockerfile: Remove ipfs from container
9dcd6aa 
The main container will now run only ipfs-cluster-service.

A new ipfs-cluster-bundle container is built by Dockerfile-bundle
which will provide ipfs-cluster+ipfs.

Fixes #197

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <code@hector.link>
@ghost ghost removed the status/ready Ready to be worked label Dec 4, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
exp/novice Someone with a little familiarity can pick up help wanted Seeking public contribution on this issue kind/enhancement A net-new feature or improvement to an existing feature P2 Medium: Good to have, but can wait until someone steps up
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@hsanjuan