Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Dependency alignment for libp2p-6.0.33, dag libraries and others #675

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Feb 19, 2019

Conversation

hsanjuan
Copy link
Collaborator

so new, so shiny

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
@hsanjuan hsanjuan added the RFM Ready for Merge label Feb 15, 2019
@ghost ghost assigned hsanjuan Feb 15, 2019
@ghost ghost added the status/in-progress In progress label Feb 15, 2019
Copy link
Contributor

@lanzafame lanzafame left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hsanjuan do you want to put this in 0.9.0 and do a rc2?

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Feb 15, 2019

Coverage Status

Coverage increased (+0.04%) to 65.837% when pulling 10d6a37 on update/libp2p-6.0.33 into d49884b on master.

License: MIT
Signed-off-by: Hector Sanjuan <hector@protocol.ai>
@hsanjuan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@lanzafame no, for next release.

@hsanjuan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

It seems I even broke migrations. #655 probably needs to go first.

@hsanjuan
Copy link
Collaborator Author

hsanjuan commented Feb 19, 2019

I'll merge this for the moment because I'm upgrading again. I will fix master in different PR.

@hsanjuan hsanjuan merged commit cc8dd7e into master Feb 19, 2019
@ghost ghost removed the status/in-progress In progress label Feb 19, 2019
@hsanjuan hsanjuan deleted the update/libp2p-6.0.33 branch February 19, 2019 13:27
@hsanjuan hsanjuan mentioned this pull request Feb 19, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
RFM Ready for Merge
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants