Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Peergos integration #117

Closed
ianopolous opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 3 comments
Closed

Peergos integration #117

ianopolous opened this issue Mar 14, 2016 · 3 comments

Comments

@ianopolous
Copy link
Member

ianopolous commented Mar 14, 2016

This is here to keep track of the requirements on IPFS for full integration into Peergos (http://github.com/ianopolous/Peergos -- https://demo.peergos.net)
These are in decreasing urgency:

  1. Transactions for spanning multiple writes relative to GC, see: idea: support for transactional groups of writes #106, Add pinning option to all write commands kubo#3544 NO LONGER NEEDED
  2. Ed25519 support in IPNS DONE
  3. Support for multiple IPNS keys in a single node DONE
  4. IPNS with a crypto CAS on the current hash. i.e. a publish which must be a signed(current hash + new hash) NO LONGER NEEDED
  5. API to publish a pre-signed IPNS entry (where the daemon doesn't have the private key) This means a cbor based record format. NO LONGER NEEDED
  6. Authenticated PubSub which doesn't require giving private keys to ipfs (external signing in application) NO LONGER NEEDED
@ianopolous
Copy link
Member Author

ianopolous commented Jun 13, 2016

We've got a new one:
5.5 Erasure code support in combination with ipfs clustering. I'm assuming this will have to wait until FileCoin. NO LONGER NEEDED

@ianopolous
Copy link
Member Author

ianopolous commented Oct 23, 2017

  1. Agree on a multi-publickey format, see: Linked-Data Key (Previously Multikey) specs#58

@ianopolous
Copy link
Member Author

ianopolous commented Jan 2, 2022

We now have ipfs-nucleus which reimplements the core of ipfs that we need, including post-quantum capability-based block level authed bitwap, so closing this.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants