Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: make StartAtPath work properly for matching walks #500

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 8, 2023

Conversation

rvagg
Copy link
Member

@rvagg rvagg commented Mar 7, 2023

The test for this was too easy and doesn't pass if you give it other things to match prior to the StartAtPath. New test added for the non-matching case, which is where this functionality is actually used (graphsync), and that works properly already.

@rvagg rvagg requested a review from hannahhoward March 7, 2023 04:56
Copy link
Collaborator

@hannahhoward hannahhoward left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, think you've correctly identified the fail

@rvagg rvagg merged commit 1d1a7b5 into master Mar 8, 2023
@rvagg rvagg deleted the rvagg/start-at-matching branch March 8, 2023 00:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
Status: 🎉 Done
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants