New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
"print" magic does not work in Python 3 #2984
Comments
On an unrelated not, when I went to look up the mailing list link, I noticed that "mailing list" on the homepage links to the dev list. Is the user list defunct, or did you just accidentally drop the user list link? |
In case it isn't clear, this is all in Python 3. |
(To answer the unrelated note: We're downplaying the user mailing list, with the intention that people ask user questions on Stackoverflow or on the new Hipchat room. But it still exists, and we'll still respond there. My filters route -dev and -user to the same folder, so I usually don't even notice which list things are on) |
Oh OK. So would you have preferred it if I had asked that question on StackOverflow? |
This one falls near the boundary between 'user question' and 'development On 25 February 2013 23:36, Aaron Meurer notifications@github.com wrote:
|
OK. I get the feeling that more of the questions I am likely to ask are like that than not, if anything because I am quite willing to submit a pull request if it turns out something is a bug in IPython (and someone points me in the right direction). Which leads me to my next question: is this something that you might want to include in IPython itself, perhaps as some option to autocall? I imagine it might be quite common among those of us who don't like autocall to still want print to work in Python 3 like it does in Python 2. |
Hmmm...maybe. The question is how much of the old syntax we'd want to We might also prefer not to have it on by default, for the same reason that I think I'd suggest what we've said about quite a few feature ideas On 26 February 2013 00:56, Aaron Meurer notifications@github.com wrote:
|
I'm going to close this, as it doesn't look like it's going anywhere. It's working as designed in that automagics are only used when they're not shadowed by a normal function. |
From the mailing list.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: