Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Revisit layout of notebook area #3224

Closed
ellisonbg opened this issue Apr 27, 2013 · 5 comments
Closed

Revisit layout of notebook area #3224

ellisonbg opened this issue Apr 27, 2013 · 5 comments
Labels
Milestone

Comments

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member

There are a couple of ways in which the current layout of the notebook is non-ideal and we need to revisit some of our design decisions:

Here is one link on this topic:

http://slendrmeans.wordpress.com/2012/12/05/better-typography-for-ipython-notebooks/

  • The notebook area is too wide - we should probably limit it to something around 940px like most web pages. nbviewer already does this.
  • Equations are currently left justified, while traditional mathematical typesetting uses centered equations. We should start out by adding some additional left margin to the equations to help them stand out against the surrounding text. B. Granger is still opposed to pure centering because of the large amount of left justified content in the notebook (input, output, images).
  • The vertical spacing above and below heading cells is too much. This causes notebooks to take up too much vertical space. It should be reduced too much though.
  • We should at least think about the question of serif versus sans serif fonts for text in the notebook.
@minrk
Copy link
Member

minrk commented Apr 28, 2013

My understanding (as described in the roadmap) is that we will look at this implementation after switching to bootstrap for layout. Is this still true?

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member Author

Yes, that is the plan...

On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 10:54 PM, Min RK notifications@github.com wrote:

My understanding (as described in the roadmap) is that we will look at
this implementation after switched to bootstrap for layout. Is this
still true?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/3224#issuecomment-17129214
.

Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger@calpoly.edu and ellisonbg@gmail.com

@minrk
Copy link
Member

minrk commented Jun 19, 2013

I presume this should be bumped to 2.0?

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member Author

Yes.

On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 7:43 AM, Min RK notifications@github.com wrote:

I presume this should be bumped to 2.0?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHubhttps://github.com//issues/3224#issuecomment-19688360
.

Brian E. Granger
Cal Poly State University, San Luis Obispo
bgranger@calpoly.edu and ellisonbg@gmail.com

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member Author

This work is basically done. See also #4786

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants