Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document when IPython.start_ipython() should be used versus IPython.embed() #3726

Closed
wolever opened this issue Jul 22, 2013 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3812
Closed

Document when IPython.start_ipython() should be used versus IPython.embed() #3726

wolever opened this issue Jul 22, 2013 · 3 comments · Fixed by #3812
Assignees
Milestone

Comments

@wolever
Copy link
Contributor

wolever commented Jul 22, 2013

@minrk (as per dev meeting on Monday)

@ivanov
Copy link
Member

ivanov commented Jul 22, 2013

changed it to start_ipython(), marking milestone 1.0 and blocker

@ivanov
Copy link
Member

ivanov commented Jul 22, 2013

(maybe blocker is overkill since this is so simple to do)

@wolever
Copy link
Contributor Author

wolever commented Jul 22, 2013

One place that will need changes: http://ipython.org/ipython-doc/dev/interactive/reference.html

@ghost ghost assigned minrk Jul 27, 2013
minrk added a commit to minrk/ipython that referenced this issue Jul 28, 2013
in what's new and the embedding section

closes ipython#3726
minrk added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 29, 2013
Describe differences between start_ipython and embed

in what's new and the embedding section

closes #3726
mattvonrocketstein pushed a commit to mattvonrocketstein/ipython that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2014
in what's new and the embedding section

closes ipython#3726
mattvonrocketstein pushed a commit to mattvonrocketstein/ipython that referenced this issue Nov 3, 2014
Describe differences between start_ipython and embed

in what's new and the embedding section

closes ipython#3726
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

3 participants