Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Widget test inconsistencies #4952

Merged
merged 3 commits into from Feb 4, 2014
Merged

Widget test inconsistencies #4952

merged 3 commits into from Feb 4, 2014

Conversation

jdfreder
Copy link
Member

  • Use wait_for_idle and new wait_for_widget instead of sleeping.

Button, float, int, multicontainer, selection widgets.
@takluyver
Copy link
Member

Tests passed. The changes look OK to me, but I'll let someone more familiar with the JS check it over.

@ellisonbg
Copy link
Member

@jdfreder are you done with this one?

@jdfreder
Copy link
Member Author

jdfreder commented Feb 3, 2014

I'm not done with this yet. I need to get it working with the string widget tests.

@jdfreder
Copy link
Member Author

jdfreder commented Feb 3, 2014

This is ready for a review now.

@jdfreder
Copy link
Member Author

jdfreder commented Feb 3, 2014

Ping @minrk , I ended adding a wait_for_widget method (in the utils file) for the tests that couldn't use wait_for_idle. I needed it for the send keys tests, where more than one message would get sent (more than one idle/busy).

minrk added a commit that referenced this pull request Feb 4, 2014
Widget test inconsistencies

add wait_for_widget
@minrk minrk merged commit 3457a5d into ipython:master Feb 4, 2014
@jdfreder jdfreder deleted the widget-tests branch March 10, 2014 18:44
mattvonrocketstein pushed a commit to mattvonrocketstein/ipython that referenced this pull request Nov 3, 2014
Widget test inconsistencies

add wait_for_widget
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants