api-session-auth: stop linking to closed issue #9710
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
pdurbin
added this to Ready for Review ⏩
in IQSS/dataverse (TO BE RETIRED / DELETED in favor of project 34)
via automation
Merged
pdurbin
changed the title
donsizemore
approved these changes
Jul 17, 2023
IQSS/dataverse (TO BE RETIRED / DELETED in favor of project 34)
automation
moved this from Ready for Review ⏩
to Ready for QA ⏩
Jul 17, 2023
pdurbin
changed the title
IQSS/dataverse (TO BE RETIRED / DELETED in favor of project 34)
automation
moved this from Ready for QA ⏩
to Done 🚀
Jul 20, 2023
Closed
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently we are linking to a closed issue
Which issue(s) this PR closes:
Closes none
Noticed while reviewing this PR:
Special notes for your reviewer:
I created this issue that we COULD link to instead:
Instead of this I simply said the feature will be removed in the future (because #9709 could use some further definition and thought).