Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade to Solr 8+ #7373

Closed
jomtov opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #7645
Closed

Upgrade to Solr 8+ #7373

jomtov opened this issue Oct 30, 2020 · 4 comments · Fixed by #7645
Assignees

Comments

@jomtov
Copy link

jomtov commented Oct 30, 2020

In present [Installation Guide] (https://guides.dataverse.org/en/latest/installation/prerequisites.html#supported-versions) you recommend Solr version 7, for which last update was 7.7.3, and is now only updating from version 8.x. Evaluate risk for obsolecense / end-of-life of version 7.

@djbrooke
Copy link
Contributor

@jomtov, thanks for opening this issue. When we discuss more we may retitle as "upgrade to version..." before we pull this into a sprint.

@djbrooke djbrooke changed the title Solr version in Installation Guide reaching EOL Upgrade to Solr 8.7 Nov 4, 2020
@djbrooke djbrooke changed the title Upgrade to Solr 8.7 Upgrade to Solr 8+ Nov 4, 2020
@djbrooke djbrooke moved this from Needs Discussion/Definition 💬 to Up Next 🛎 in IQSS/dataverse (TO BE RETIRED / DELETED in favor of project 34) Nov 4, 2020
@djbrooke
Copy link
Contributor

djbrooke commented Jan 6, 2021

  • We'll try to handle this with a discussion in dv-tech or tech hours
  • We should make sure to read the release notes as there may be incompatibilities

@djbrooke djbrooke added the Medium label Jan 6, 2021
@poikilotherm
Copy link
Contributor

thought: I would be glad and honored to be part of the discussion.

@donsizemore
Copy link
Contributor

FWIW, I just ran integration tests against develop and Solr 8.7.0.

test run: 1311, 0 errors, 0 failures.

Basic search seems to work. Lots of search warnings and errors in server.log though:

180 occurrences of

[#|2021-01-07T15:12:48.605+0000|SEVERE|Payara 5.2020.6|edu.harvard.iq.dataverse.search.SearchServiceBean|_ThreadID=68;_ThreadName=http-thread-pool::http-listener-1(5);_TimeMillis=1610032368605;_LevelValue=1000;|
  java.lang.IllegalAccessException: Class edu.harvard.iq.dataverse.search.SearchServiceBean can not access a member of class edu.harvard.iq.dataverse.search.SearchFields with modifiers "private static transient"
	at edu.harvard.iq.dataverse.search.SearchServiceBean.search(SearchServiceBean.java:684)
	at edu.harvard.iq.dataverse.search.__EJB31_Generated__SearchServiceBean__Intf____Bean__.search(Unknown Source)

but I think we're already seeing those regularly. The instance is still up if anyone wants to poke at it.

@sekmiller sekmiller self-assigned this Feb 23, 2021
@sekmiller sekmiller moved this from Up Next 🛎 to IQSS Team - In Progress 💻 in IQSS/dataverse (TO BE RETIRED / DELETED in favor of project 34) Feb 23, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 1, 2021
@sekmiller sekmiller moved this from IQSS Team - In Progress 💻 to Review 🦁 in IQSS/dataverse (TO BE RETIRED / DELETED in favor of project 34) Mar 2, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 2, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 3, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 4, 2021
sekmiller added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

5 participants