Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

[github-actions]

Fixes #12

Status

This pull request was autonomously generated by AutoPR.

If there's a problem with this pull request, please open an issue.

Description

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called tech_jargon_generator.py that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

Progress Updates

Click to see progress updates

Planning pull request...

Running rail InitialFileSelect in two steps...

Ran raw query

Prompt

Hey, somebody just opened an issue in my repo, could you help me write a pull request?

The issue is:
```#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

```

The list of files in the repo is:
```README.md (186 tokens)
.github/workflows/autopr.yml (539 tokens)```

Should we take a look at any files? If so, pick only a few files (max 5000 tokens). 
If looking at files would be a waste of time with regard to the issue, let me know.

Response

No need to look at the files for now. We can start by creating a new branch for this issue and then work on the implementation of the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script. Once the script and tests are done, we will update the README.md file accordingly.

Here are the steps to follow:

1. Create a new branch
```bash
git checkout -b issue-12-tech-jargon-generator
```

2. Create the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script with the following implementation:

```python
import random

verbs = ["Deploy", "Optimize", "Leverage"]
adjectives = ["Agile", "Scalable", "Robust"]
nouns = ["Blockchain", "Machine Learning", "IoT"]

def generate_tech_jargon():
    return f"{random.choice(verbs)} {random.choice(adjectives)} {random.choice(nouns)}"

def test_tech_jargon_generator():
    generated_jargon = generate_tech_jargon().split(' ')
    assert len(generated_jargon) == 3, "Generated jargon does not have 3 words."
    assert generated_jargon[0] in verbs, "First word not found in verbs list."
    assert generated_jargon[1] in adjectives, "Second word not found in adjectives list."
    assert generated_jargon[2] in nouns, "Third word not found in nouns list."

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(generate_tech_jargon())

```

3. Update the `README.md` file to include a description of the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script, its purpose, and usage instructions:

```
# Tech Jargon Generator

This script generates funny and creative tech jargon phrases by combining random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns).

## Usage

To use the Tech Jargon Generator, simply run the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script in your terminal:

```bash
python tech_jargon_generator.py
```

This will output a randomly generated tech jargon phrase.
```

4. Commit your changes and push the branch to the remote repository:

```bash
git add tech_jargon_generator.py README.md
git commit -m "Implemented Tech Jargon Generator (issue #12)"
git push origin issue-12-tech-jargon-generator
```

5. Create a pull request on GitHub for the `issue-12-tech-jargon-generator` branch. In the description, mention the issue number (`#12`) and a brief summary of the changes made.

Once the pull request is reviewed and approved, it can be merged into the main branch.

InitialFileSelectResponse: Failed to parse output dict

Prompt

```
No need to look at the files for now. We can start by creating a new branch for this issue and then work on the implementation of the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script. Once the script and tests are done, we will update the README.md file accordingly.

Here are the steps to follow:

1. Create a new branch
```bash
git checkout -b issue-12-tech-jargon-generator
```

2. Create the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script with the following implementation:

```python
import random

verbs = ["Deploy", "Optimize", "Leverage"]
adjectives = ["Agile", "Scalable", "Robust"]
nouns = ["Blockchain", "Machine Learning", "IoT"]

def generate_tech_jargon():
    return f"{random.choice(verbs)} {random.choice(adjectives)} {random.choice(nouns)}"

def test_tech_jargon_generator():
    generated_jargon = generate_tech_jargon().split(' ')
    assert len(generated_jargon) == 3, "Generated jargon does not have 3 words."
    assert generated_jargon[0] in verbs, "First word not found in verbs list."
    assert generated_jargon[1] in adjectives, "Second word not found in adjectives list."
    assert generated_jargon[2] in nouns, "Third word not found in nouns list."

if __name__ == "__main__":
    print(generate_tech_jargon())

```

3. Update the `README.md` file to include a description of the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script, its purpose, and usage instructions:

```
# Tech Jargon Generator

This script generates funny and creative tech jargon phrases by combining random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns).

## Usage

To use the Tech Jargon Generator, simply run the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script in your terminal:

```bash
python tech_jargon_generator.py
```

This will output a randomly generated tech jargon phrase.
```

4. Commit your changes and push the branch to the remote repository:

```bash
git add tech_jargon_generator.py README.md
git commit -m "Implemented Tech Jargon Generator (issue #12)"
git push origin issue-12-tech-jargon-generator
```

5. Create a pull request on GitHub for the `issue-12-tech-jargon-generator` branch. In the description, mention the issue number (`#12`) and a brief summary of the changes made.

Once the pull request is reviewed and approved, it can be merged into the main branch.
```

If looking at files would be a waste of time, please submit an empty list.


Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.

```xml
<output>
    <list name="filepaths">
        <string description="Files in this repository that we should look at."/>
    </list>
</output>
```


ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary), where the key of the field in JSON is the `name` attribute of the corresponding XML, and the value is of the type specified by the corresponding XML's tag. The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise.

Here are examples of simple (XML, JSON) pairs that show the expected behavior:
- `<string name='foo' format='two-words lower-case' />` => `{'foo': 'example one'}`
- `<list name='bar'><string format='upper-case' /></list>` => `{"bar": ['STRING ONE', 'STRING TWO', etc.]}`
- `<object name='baz'><string name="foo" format="capitalize two-words" /><integer name="index" format="1-indexed" /></object>` => `{'baz': {'foo': 'Some String', 'index': 1}}`

Raw Response

{
  "filepaths": []
}

Dict Response

{}

Error

Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "/app/autopr/services/rail_service.py", line 90, in run_rail_object
    parsed_obj = rail_object.parse_obj(dict_o)
  File "pydantic/main.py", line 526, in pydantic.main.BaseModel.parse_obj
  File "pydantic/main.py", line 341, in pydantic.main.BaseModel.__init__
pydantic.error_wrappers.ValidationError: 1 validation error for InitialFileSelectResponse
filepaths
  field required (type=value_error.missing)

Running rail ProposePullRequest in two steps...

Ran raw query

Prompt

Hey somebody just submitted an issue, could you own it, write some commits, and a pull request?

These are notes we took while looking at the repo:
```The repository's contents were irrelevant, only create new files to address the issue.```

This is the issue that was opened:
```#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

```

When you're done, send me the pull request title, body, and a list of commits, eachcoupled with which files we should be looking at to write the commit's code.
Ensure you specify the files relevant to the commit, especially if the commit is a refactor.

Response

Sure, I'll handle this issue for you. I'll create the necessary files and make the required changes. Here's a breakdown of the commits and pull request details:

Pull Request Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

Pull Request Body:
```
This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.
```

List of commits:

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
   - Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
   ```
   Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
   ```

2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
   - Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
   ```
   Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
   ```

3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
   - Files: README.md
   ```
   Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
   ```

Once the pull request is reviewed and merged, the issue should be resolved. Let me know if you need any further assistance.

PullRequestDescription: Parsed output

Prompt

```
Sure, I'll handle this issue for you. I'll create the necessary files and make the required changes. Here's a breakdown of the commits and pull request details:

Pull Request Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

Pull Request Body:
```
This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.
```

List of commits:

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
   - Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
   ```
   Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
   ```

2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
   - Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
   ```
   Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
   ```

3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
   - Files: README.md
   ```
   Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
   ```

Once the pull request is reviewed and merged, the issue should be resolved. Let me know if you need any further assistance.
```


Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.

```xml
<output>
    <string name="title" description="The title of the pull request."/>
    <string name="body" description="The body of the pull request."/>
    <list name="commits" on-fail="reask" description="The commits that will be made in this pull request. Commits must change the code in the repository, and must not be empty.">
        <object>
            <string name="commit_message" description="The commit message, concisely describing the changes made." length="1 100" on-fail="noop"/>
            <list name="relevant_file_hunks" description="The files we should be looking at while writing this commit. Include files that whose contents will be called by the code in this commit, and files that will be changed by this commit.">
                <object>
                    <string name="filepath" description="The path to the file we are looking at." format="filepath" on-fail="noop"/>
                    <integer name="start_line" description="The line number of the first line of the hunk." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
                    <integer name="end_line" description="The line number of the last line of the hunk." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
                </object>
            </list>
            <string name="commit_changes_description" description="A description of the changes made in this commit, in the form of a list of bullet points." required="true" length="1 1000"/>
        </object>
    </list>
</output>
```


ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary), where the key of the field in JSON is the `name` attribute of the corresponding XML, and the value is of the type specified by the corresponding XML's tag. The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise.

Here are examples of simple (XML, JSON) pairs that show the expected behavior:
- `<string name='foo' format='two-words lower-case' />` => `{'foo': 'example one'}`
- `<list name='bar'><string format='upper-case' /></list>` => `{"bar": ['STRING ONE', 'STRING TWO', etc.]}`
- `<object name='baz'><string name="foo" format="capitalize two-words" /><integer name="index" format="1-indexed" /></object>` => `{'baz': {'foo': 'Some String', 'index': 1}}`

Raw Response

{
    "title": "Feature: Tech Jargon Generator",
    "body": "This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:\n\n1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.\n2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.\n3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.\n\nPlease review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.",
    "commits": [
        {
            "commit_message": "Create tech_jargon_generator.py",
            "relevant_file_hunks": [
                {
                    "filepath": "tech_jargon_generator.py"
                }
            ],
            "commit_changes_description": "Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists."
        },
        {
            "commit_message": "Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py",
            "relevant_file_hunks": [
                {
                    "filepath": "tech_jargon_generator.py"
                }
            ],
            "commit_changes_description": "Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format."
        },
        {
            "commit_message": "Update README.md with project details and usage instructions",
            "relevant_file_hunks": [
                {
                    "filepath": "README.md"
                }
            ],
            "commit_changes_description": "Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator."
        }
    ]
}

Parsed Response

{
  "title": "Feature: Tech Jargon Generator",
  "body": "This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:\n\n1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.\n2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.\n3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.\n\nPlease review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.",
  "commits": [
    {
      "commit_message": "Create tech_jargon_generator.py",
      "relevant_file_hunks": [
        {
          "filepath": "tech_jargon_generator.py",
          "start_line": null,
          "end_line": null
        }
      ],
      "commit_changes_description": "Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists."
    },
    {
      "commit_message": "Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py",
      "relevant_file_hunks": [
        {
          "filepath": "tech_jargon_generator.py",
          "start_line": null,
          "end_line": null
        }
      ],
      "commit_changes_description": "Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format."
    },
    {
      "commit_message": "Update README.md with project details and usage instructions",
      "relevant_file_hunks": [
        {
          "filepath": "README.md",
          "start_line": null,
          "end_line": null
        }
      ],
      "commit_changes_description": "Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator."
    }
  ]
}

Implementing commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py

Deciding what action to take

Running rail MakeDecision in one step...

Action: Parsed output

Prompt

```
You are about to make a decision on what to do next.

This is the issue that was opened:
```#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

```

This is the pull request we're creating:
```Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
    Files: README.md
    Changes:
      Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
```

This is the commit we're writing:
```Create tech_jargon_generator.py

Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.```

This is the codebase subset we decided to look at:
``````

These are the actions we've taken so far:
``````

In our pursuit of implementing this commit, please make a decision on what to do next.
If a new file should be created, respond with `new_file` and the file path and description. 
If one of the files in the codebase subset should be edited, respond with `edit_file` and the file path, description, and line numbers of the hunk to edit. When picking the line numbers, keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description. If you don't know which line numbers to pick, leave them blank.
If you're done, respond with `finished` and the commit message describing the past actions.
```


Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.

```xml
<output>
    <string name="action" choices="new_file,edit_file,finished"/>
    <object name="new_file" description="new_file" if="action==new_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the newly created file." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the contents of the new file." required="true"/>
    </object>
    <object name="edit_file" description="edit_file" if="action==edit_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the file to be edited." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the changes to be made to the file." required="true"/>
        <integer name="start_line" description="The line number of the first line of the hunk to be edited." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
        <integer name="end_line" description="The line number of the last line of the hunk to be edited. Keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
    </object>
    <string name="finished" description="commit_message: A more appropriate commit message based on the actions taken." required="false" if="action==finished"/>
</output>
```


ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary), where the key of the field in JSON is the `name` attribute of the corresponding XML, and the value is of the type specified by the corresponding XML's tag. The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise.

Here are examples of simple (XML, JSON) pairs that show the expected behavior:
- `<string name='foo' format='two-words lower-case' />` => `{'foo': 'example one'}`
- `<list name='bar'><string format='upper-case' /></list>` => `{"bar": ['STRING ONE', 'STRING TWO', etc.]}`
- `<object name='baz'><string name="foo" format="capitalize two-words" /><integer name="index" format="1-indexed" /></object>` => `{'baz': {'foo': 'Some String', 'index': 1}}`

Raw Response

{
  "action": "new_file",
  "new_file": {
    "filepath": "tech_jargon_generator.py",
    "description": "Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists."
  }
}

Parsed Response

{
  "action": "new_file",
  "new_file": {
    "filepath": "tech_jargon_generator.py",
    "description": "Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists."
  },
  "edit_file": null,
  "commit_message": null
}

Creating new file: tech_jargon_generator.py

Running chain NewFileChain

GeneratedHunkOutputParser: Parsed result

Prompt

Human: Hey, we've got a new file to create.

This is the issue that was opened:
```
#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.


```

This is the pull request we're creating:
```
Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
    Files: README.md
    Changes:
      Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.

```

This is the commit we're writing:
```
Create tech_jargon_generator.py

Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
```

This is the codebase subset we decided to look at:
```

```

This is the plan for the file we're creating:
```
Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
```

Please send me the contents of the file.

RESPONSE FORMAT INSTRUCTIONS
----------------------------

When responding to me, please use the following format. Make sure you return both the code enclosed in backticks and the JSON immediately after.

```
<string>
```
{
    "outcome": string  # A description of the outcome of the attempt to rewrite the file hunk according to the problem statement.
}

Raw Response

```python
import random

def generate_tech_jargon():
    verbs = ["Optimize", "Leverage", "Innovate", "Revolutionize", "Automate"]
    adjectives = ["Scalable", "Agile", "Robust", "Data-Driven", "Machine-Learning"]
    nouns = ["Platform", "API", "Blockchain", "IoT", "Algorithm"]

    verb = random.choice(verbs)
    adjective = random.choice(adjectives)
    noun = random.choice(nouns)

    tech_jargon = f"{verb} {adjective} {noun}"
    return tech_jargon

def test_tech_jargon_format():
    tech_jargon = generate_tech_jargon()
    words = tech_jargon.split()
    assert len(words) == 3, "Tech jargon phrase must have exactly 3 words."

if __name__ == "__main__":
    test_tech_jargon_format()
    for _ in range(5):
        print(generate_tech_jargon())
```
{
    "outcome": "Created a Python script to generate tech jargon phrases by combining random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists. Included a test function to verify the output format."
}

Result

{
  "contents": "import random\n\ndef generate_tech_jargon():\n    verbs = [\"Optimize\", \"Leverage\", \"Innovate\", \"Revolutionize\", \"Automate\"]\n    adjectives = [\"Scalable\", \"Agile\", \"Robust\", \"Data-Driven\", \"Machine-Learning\"]\n    nouns = [\"Platform\", \"API\", \"Blockchain\", \"IoT\", \"Algorithm\"]\n\n    verb = random.choice(verbs)\n    adjective = random.choice(adjectives)\n    noun = random.choice(nouns)\n\n    tech_jargon = f\"{verb} {adjective} {noun}\"\n    return tech_jargon\n\ndef test_tech_jargon_format():\n    tech_jargon = generate_tech_jargon()\n    words = tech_jargon.split()\n    assert len(words) == 3, \"Tech jargon phrase must have exactly 3 words.\"\n\nif __name__ == \"__main__\":\n    test_tech_jargon_format()\n    for _ in range(5):\n        print(generate_tech_jargon())",
  "outcome": "Created a Python script to generate tech jargon phrases by combining random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists. Included a test function to verify the output format."
}

Finished new_file action: Created a Python script to generate tech jargon phrases by combining random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists. Included a test function to verify the output format.

Deciding what action to take

Running rail MakeDecision in one step...

Action: Parsed output

Prompt

```
You are about to make a decision on what to do next.

This is the issue that was opened:
```#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

```

This is the pull request we're creating:
```Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
    Files: README.md
    Changes:
      Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
```

This is the commit we're writing:
```Create tech_jargon_generator.py

Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.```

This is the codebase subset we decided to look at:
```>>> File: tech_jargon_generator.py

 1 | import random
 2 | 
 3 | def generate_tech_jargon():
 4 |     verbs = ["Optimize", "Leverage", "Innovate", "Revolutionize", "Automate"]
 5 |     adjectives = ["Scalable", "Agile", "Robust", "Data-Driven", "Machine-Learning"]
 6 |     nouns = ["Platform", "API", "Blockchain", "IoT", "Algorithm"]
 7 | 
 8 |     verb = random.choice(verbs)
 9 |     adjective = random.choice(adjectives)
10 |     noun = random.choice(nouns)
11 | 
12 |     tech_jargon = f"{verb} {adjective} {noun}"
13 |     return tech_jargon
14 | 
15 | def test_tech_jargon_format():
16 |     tech_jargon = generate_tech_jargon()
17 |     words = tech_jargon.split()
18 |     assert len(words) == 3, "Tech jargon phrase must have exactly 3 words."
19 | 
20 | if __name__ == "__main__":
21 |     test_tech_jargon_format()
22 |     for _ in range(5):
23 |         print(generate_tech_jargon())```

These are the actions we've taken so far:
```Created file tech_jargon_generator.py: Created a Python script to generate tech jargon phrases by combining random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists. Included a test function to verify the output format.```

In our pursuit of implementing this commit, please make a decision on what to do next.
If a new file should be created, respond with `new_file` and the file path and description. 
If one of the files in the codebase subset should be edited, respond with `edit_file` and the file path, description, and line numbers of the hunk to edit. When picking the line numbers, keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description. If you don't know which line numbers to pick, leave them blank.
If you're done, respond with `finished` and the commit message describing the past actions.
```


Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.

```xml
<output>
    <string name="action" choices="new_file,edit_file,finished"/>
    <object name="new_file" description="new_file" if="action==new_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the newly created file." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the contents of the new file." required="true"/>
    </object>
    <object name="edit_file" description="edit_file" if="action==edit_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the file to be edited." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the changes to be made to the file." required="true"/>
        <integer name="start_line" description="The line number of the first line of the hunk to be edited." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
        <integer name="end_line" description="The line number of the last line of the hunk to be edited. Keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
    </object>
    <string name="finished" description="commit_message: A more appropriate commit message based on the actions taken." required="false" if="action==finished"/>
</output>
```


ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary), where the key of the field in JSON is the `name` attribute of the corresponding XML, and the value is of the type specified by the corresponding XML's tag. The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise.

Here are examples of simple (XML, JSON) pairs that show the expected behavior:
- `<string name='foo' format='two-words lower-case' />` => `{'foo': 'example one'}`
- `<list name='bar'><string format='upper-case' /></list>` => `{"bar": ['STRING ONE', 'STRING TWO', etc.]}`
- `<object name='baz'><string name="foo" format="capitalize two-words" /><integer name="index" format="1-indexed" /></object>` => `{'baz': {'foo': 'Some String', 'index': 1}}`

Raw Response

{
  "action": "finished",
  "finished": "Created tech_jargon_generator.py with a function to generate tech jargon phrases and a test function to verify the output format"
}

Parsed Response

{
  "action": "finished",
  "new_file": null,
  "edit_file": null,
  "commit_message": null
}

Finished writing commit

Implementing commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py

Deciding what action to take

Running rail MakeDecision in one step...

Action: Parsed output

Prompt

```
You are about to make a decision on what to do next.

This is the issue that was opened:
```#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

```

This is the pull request we're creating:
```Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
    Files: README.md
    Changes:
      Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
```

This is the commit we're writing:
```Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py

Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.```

This is the codebase subset we decided to look at:
```>>> File: tech_jargon_generator.py

 1 | import random
 2 | 
 3 | def generate_tech_jargon():
 4 |     verbs = ["Optimize", "Leverage", "Innovate", "Revolutionize", "Automate"]
 5 |     adjectives = ["Scalable", "Agile", "Robust", "Data-Driven", "Machine-Learning"]
 6 |     nouns = ["Platform", "API", "Blockchain", "IoT", "Algorithm"]
 7 | 
 8 |     verb = random.choice(verbs)
 9 |     adjective = random.choice(adjectives)
10 |     noun = random.choice(nouns)
11 | 
12 |     tech_jargon = f"{verb} {adjective} {noun}"
13 |     return tech_jargon
14 | 
15 | def test_tech_jargon_format():
16 |     tech_jargon = generate_tech_jargon()
17 |     words = tech_jargon.split()
18 |     assert len(words) == 3, "Tech jargon phrase must have exactly 3 words."
19 | 
20 | if __name__ == "__main__":
21 |     test_tech_jargon_format()
22 |     for _ in range(5):
23 |         print(generate_tech_jargon())```

These are the actions we've taken so far:
``````

In our pursuit of implementing this commit, please make a decision on what to do next.
If a new file should be created, respond with `new_file` and the file path and description. 
If one of the files in the codebase subset should be edited, respond with `edit_file` and the file path, description, and line numbers of the hunk to edit. When picking the line numbers, keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description. If you don't know which line numbers to pick, leave them blank.
If you're done, respond with `finished` and the commit message describing the past actions.
```


Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.

```xml
<output>
    <string name="action" choices="new_file,edit_file,finished"/>
    <object name="new_file" description="new_file" if="action==new_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the newly created file." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the contents of the new file." required="true"/>
    </object>
    <object name="edit_file" description="edit_file" if="action==edit_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the file to be edited." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the changes to be made to the file." required="true"/>
        <integer name="start_line" description="The line number of the first line of the hunk to be edited." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
        <integer name="end_line" description="The line number of the last line of the hunk to be edited. Keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
    </object>
    <string name="finished" description="commit_message: A more appropriate commit message based on the actions taken." required="false" if="action==finished"/>
</output>
```


ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary), where the key of the field in JSON is the `name` attribute of the corresponding XML, and the value is of the type specified by the corresponding XML's tag. The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise.

Here are examples of simple (XML, JSON) pairs that show the expected behavior:
- `<string name='foo' format='two-words lower-case' />` => `{'foo': 'example one'}`
- `<list name='bar'><string format='upper-case' /></list>` => `{"bar": ['STRING ONE', 'STRING TWO', etc.]}`
- `<object name='baz'><string name="foo" format="capitalize two-words" /><integer name="index" format="1-indexed" /></object>` => `{'baz': {'foo': 'Some String', 'index': 1}}`

Raw Response

{
  "action": "finished",
  "finished": "Add test function to verify the correct format of generated tech jargon phrases"
}

Parsed Response

{
  "action": "finished",
  "new_file": null,
  "edit_file": null,
  "commit_message": null
}

Finished writing commit

Implementing commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions

Deciding what action to take

Running rail MakeDecision in one step...

Action: Parsed output

Prompt

```
You are about to make a decision on what to do next.

This is the issue that was opened:
```#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

```

This is the pull request we're creating:
```Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
    Files: README.md
    Changes:
      Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
```

This is the commit we're writing:
```Update README.md with project details and usage instructions

Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.```

This is the codebase subset we decided to look at:
```>>> File: README.md

 1 | <div align="center">
 2 | 
 3 | # 🚀 AutoPR Template 🚀
 4 | 
 5 | [![Discord](https://badgen.net/badge/icon/discord?icon=discord&label&color=purple)](https://discord.gg/ykk7Znt3K6)
 6 | 
 7 | [AutoPR](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR) automatically writes pull requests in response to issues with ChatGPT.  
 8 | 
 9 | </div>
10 | 
11 | # 🛠 Usage
12 | 
13 | Please see [USAGE.md](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR/blob/main/USAGE.md) for more information.
14 | 
15 | If you'd like to try out GPT-4 AutoPR, you can make an issue in this repository, and I'll run it manually.
16 | ```

These are the actions we've taken so far:
``````

In our pursuit of implementing this commit, please make a decision on what to do next.
If a new file should be created, respond with `new_file` and the file path and description. 
If one of the files in the codebase subset should be edited, respond with `edit_file` and the file path, description, and line numbers of the hunk to edit. When picking the line numbers, keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description. If you don't know which line numbers to pick, leave them blank.
If you're done, respond with `finished` and the commit message describing the past actions.
```


Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.

```xml
<output>
    <string name="action" choices="new_file,edit_file,finished"/>
    <object name="new_file" description="new_file" if="action==new_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the newly created file." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the contents of the new file." required="true"/>
    </object>
    <object name="edit_file" description="edit_file" if="action==edit_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the file to be edited." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the changes to be made to the file." required="true"/>
        <integer name="start_line" description="The line number of the first line of the hunk to be edited." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
        <integer name="end_line" description="The line number of the last line of the hunk to be edited. Keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
    </object>
    <string name="finished" description="commit_message: A more appropriate commit message based on the actions taken." required="false" if="action==finished"/>
</output>
```


ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary), where the key of the field in JSON is the `name` attribute of the corresponding XML, and the value is of the type specified by the corresponding XML's tag. The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise.

Here are examples of simple (XML, JSON) pairs that show the expected behavior:
- `<string name='foo' format='two-words lower-case' />` => `{'foo': 'example one'}`
- `<list name='bar'><string format='upper-case' /></list>` => `{"bar": ['STRING ONE', 'STRING TWO', etc.]}`
- `<object name='baz'><string name="foo" format="capitalize two-words" /><integer name="index" format="1-indexed" /></object>` => `{'baz': {'foo': 'Some String', 'index': 1}}`

Raw Response

{
  "action": "edit_file",
  "edit_file": {
    "filepath": "README.md",
    "description": "Update the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.",
    "start_line": 9,
    "end_line": 16
  }
}

Parsed Response

{
  "action": "edit_file",
  "new_file": null,
  "edit_file": {
    "filepath": "README.md",
    "description": "Update the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.",
    "start_line": 9,
    "end_line": 16
  },
  "commit_message": null
}

Editing existing file: README.md

Running chain RewriteCodeHunkChain

GeneratedHunkOutputParser: Parsed result

Prompt

Human: Hey, we've got a new code hunk to diff.
    
This is the issue that was opened:
```
#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.


```
    
This is the pull request we're creating:
```
Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
    Files: README.md
    Changes:
      Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.

```
    
This is the commit we're writing:
```
Update README.md with project details and usage instructions

Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
```
    
This is the codebase subset we decided to look at:
```
>>> File: README.md

 1 | <div align="center">
 2 | 
 3 | # 🚀 AutoPR Template 🚀
 4 | 
 5 | [![Discord](https://badgen.net/badge/icon/discord?icon=discord&label&color=purple)](https://discord.gg/ykk7Znt3K6)
 6 | 
 7 | [AutoPR](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR) automatically writes pull requests in response to issues with ChatGPT.  
 8 | 
 9 | </div>
10 | 
11 | # 🛠 Usage
12 | 
13 | Please see [USAGE.md](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR/blob/main/USAGE.md) for more information.
14 | 
15 | If you'd like to try out GPT-4 AutoPR, you can make an issue in this repository, and I'll run it manually.
16 | 
```
    
This is the hunk we're rewriting:
```
 6 | 
 7 | [AutoPR](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR) automatically writes pull requests in response to issues with ChatGPT.  
 8 | 
 9 * </div>
10 * 
11 * # 🛠 Usage
12 * 
13 * Please see [USAGE.md](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR/blob/main/USAGE.md) for more information.
14 * 
15 * If you'd like to try out GPT-4 AutoPR, you can make an issue in this repository, and I'll run it manually.
16 * 
```
    
This is the plan for how we want to rewrite the hunk:
```
Update the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
```
    
Please rewrite the hunk to match the plan, but do not include any lines prefixed with | in the result.

RULES:
- ONLY rewrite the lines prefixed with *, 
- submit only the lines without the * prefix,
- do not preserve the relative leading indentation of the lines (start the hunk's indentation at 0).
    
RESPONSE FORMAT INSTRUCTIONS
----------------------------

When responding to me, please use the following format. Make sure you return both the code enclosed in backticks and the JSON immediately after.

```
<string>
```
{
    "outcome": string  # A description of the outcome of the attempt to rewrite the file hunk according to the problem statement.
}

Raw Response

```
</div>

# 🛠 Usage

Please see [USAGE.md](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR/blob/main/USAGE.md) for more information on using AutoPR.

# Tech Jargon Generator

This project includes a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. The script also includes a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.

## Usage Instructions

To use the tech jargon generator, simply run the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script. A random tech jargon phrase will be generated and printed to the console.

If you'd like to try out GPT-4 AutoPR, you can make an issue in this repository, and I'll run it manually.
```
{
    "outcome": "The hunk has been successfully rewritten to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator."
}

Result

{
  "contents": "</div>\n\n# \ud83d\udee0 Usage\n\nPlease see [USAGE.md](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR/blob/main/USAGE.md) for more information on using AutoPR.\n\n# Tech Jargon Generator\n\nThis project includes a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. The script also includes a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.\n\n## Usage Instructions\n\nTo use the tech jargon generator, simply run the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script. A random tech jargon phrase will be generated and printed to the console.\n\nIf you'd like to try out GPT-4 AutoPR, you can make an issue in this repository, and I'll run it manually.",
  "outcome": "The hunk has been successfully rewritten to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator."
}

Finished edit_file action: The hunk has been successfully rewritten to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.

Deciding what action to take

Running rail MakeDecision in one step...

Action: Parsed output

Prompt

```
You are about to make a decision on what to do next.

This is the issue that was opened:
```#12 Create a 'Tech Jargon Generator'

irgolic: Develop a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. Include a test function that verifies the output has the correct format. Modify the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

```

This is the pull request we're creating:
```Title: Feature: Tech Jargon Generator

This pull request addresses issue #12. The following changes have been made:

1. Developed a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases.
2. Included a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
3. Modified the README.md file to describe the project, its purpose, and usage instructions.

Please review the changes and let me know if anything needs to be modified.

1. Commit: Create tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added the main script to generate tech jargon phrases with a function to combine random words from verbs, adjectives, and nouns lists.
2. Commit: Add test function to tech_jargon_generator.py
    Files: tech_jargon_generator.py
    Changes:
      Added a test function to verify that the generated tech jargon phrase has the correct format.
3. Commit: Update README.md with project details and usage instructions
    Files: README.md
    Changes:
      Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.
```

This is the commit we're writing:
```Update README.md with project details and usage instructions

Updated the README.md file to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.```

This is the codebase subset we decided to look at:
```>>> File: README.md

 1 | <div align="center">
 2 | 
 3 | # 🚀 AutoPR Template 🚀
 4 | 
 5 | [![Discord](https://badgen.net/badge/icon/discord?icon=discord&label&color=purple)](https://discord.gg/ykk7Znt3K6)
 6 | 
 7 | [AutoPR](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR) automatically writes pull requests in response to issues with ChatGPT.  
 8 | 
 9 | </div>
10 | 
11 | # 🛠 Usage
12 | 
13 | Please see [USAGE.md](https://github.com/irgolic/AutoPR/blob/main/USAGE.md) for more information on using AutoPR.
14 | 
15 | # Tech Jargon Generator
16 | 
17 | This project includes a Python script called `tech_jargon_generator.py` that combines random words from three lists (verbs, adjectives, and nouns) to create funny and creative tech jargon phrases. The script also includes a test function that verifies the output has the correct format.
18 | 
19 | ## Usage Instructions
20 | 
21 | To use the tech jargon generator, simply run the `tech_jargon_generator.py` script. A random tech jargon phrase will be generated and printed to the console.
22 | 
23 | If you'd like to try out GPT-4 AutoPR, you can make an issue in this repository, and I'll run it manually.```

These are the actions we've taken so far:
```Created file README.md: The hunk has been successfully rewritten to include the project's purpose and usage instructions for the tech jargon generator.```

In our pursuit of implementing this commit, please make a decision on what to do next.
If a new file should be created, respond with `new_file` and the file path and description. 
If one of the files in the codebase subset should be edited, respond with `edit_file` and the file path, description, and line numbers of the hunk to edit. When picking the line numbers, keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description. If you don't know which line numbers to pick, leave them blank.
If you're done, respond with `finished` and the commit message describing the past actions.
```


Given below is XML that describes the information to extract from this document and the tags to extract it into.

```xml
<output>
    <string name="action" choices="new_file,edit_file,finished"/>
    <object name="new_file" description="new_file" if="action==new_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the newly created file." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the contents of the new file." required="true"/>
    </object>
    <object name="edit_file" description="edit_file" if="action==edit_file">
        <string name="filepath" description="Path to the file to be edited." required="true"/>
        <string name="description" description="Description of the changes to be made to the file." required="true"/>
        <integer name="start_line" description="The line number of the first line of the hunk to be edited." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
        <integer name="end_line" description="The line number of the last line of the hunk to be edited. Keep the hunk as short as possible while fulfilling the description." format="positive" required="false" on-fail="noop"/>
    </object>
    <string name="finished" description="commit_message: A more appropriate commit message based on the actions taken." required="false" if="action==finished"/>
</output>
```


ONLY return a valid JSON object (no other text is necessary), where the key of the field in JSON is the `name` attribute of the corresponding XML, and the value is of the type specified by the corresponding XML's tag. The JSON MUST conform to the XML format, including any types and format requests e.g. requests for lists, objects and specific types. Be correct and concise.

Here are examples of simple (XML, JSON) pairs that show the expected behavior:
- `<string name='foo' format='two-words lower-case' />` => `{'foo': 'example one'}`
- `<list name='bar'><string format='upper-case' /></list>` => `{"bar": ['STRING ONE', 'STRING TWO', etc.]}`
- `<object name='baz'><string name="foo" format="capitalize two-words" /><integer name="index" format="1-indexed" /></object>` => `{'baz': {'foo': 'Some String', 'index': 1}}`

Raw Response

{
  "action": "finished",
  "finished": "Update README.md with project details and usage instructions"
}

Parsed Response

{
  "action": "finished",
  "new_file": null,
  "edit_file": null,
  "commit_message": null
}

Finished writing commit