You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
A student reported the disconnection between lessons and labs:
The problem that I see and that on a personal level is weighing me down, is that the content of the learnings we see in class barely covers 15% of the practices we do afterwards. That is to say, you are all day long watching some contents that are already yes they are simple and they are quite explained on the platform (I read it every day on the subway and I have no difficulty in following it) but they are not enough or a joke to comply with the labs, which on the other hand are phenomenal, are very complete, and that's where you really learn. I would change the structure of the classes, that each one will read the corresponding lesson at home, the next day if there are doubts and quickly we get into the lab, because that is where the doubts arise and where you need to have a teacher at hand.
In summary, in my opinion the labs can not start at 17 in the afternoon because they are not covered and this is where the chicha is, the labs have to be the core of the course and the lessons of the plataforms read them at home since they do not imply no difficulty, using every day 2-3 hours to explain what the platform to me seems frankly inefficient.
Use this ticket to record student feedback from the Madrid Oct. 2018 cohort
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: