Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[ITG-79] Setup CI #15

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 9, 2022
Merged

[ITG-79] Setup CI #15

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 9, 2022

Conversation

john-sonz
Copy link
Collaborator

CI setup for bode and cabra.


Resources

https://kulawska.atlassian.net/browse/ITG-79

@john-sonz john-sonz self-assigned this Apr 8, 2022
@john-sonz john-sonz requested a review from tgargula April 8, 2022 15:45
Comment on lines 3 to 7
on:
pull_request:
paths:
- "bode/**"
branches: [develop, master]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wdyt of adding:

  push:
    branches: [develop, master]

Since our repo is public, we don't have limitations on the CI
image

See Github pricing: https://github.com/pricing

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@john-sonz john-sonz Apr 8, 2022

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Well, why not 💸 💸 💸
I think we can go even further and do

on:
    pull_request:
        paths:
          - "cabra/**"
    push:
        paths:
          - "cabra/**"

Comment on lines 3 to 7
on:
pull_request:
paths:
- "cabra/**"
branches: [develop, master]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I would add it here as well.

  push:
    branches: [develop, master]

@john-sonz john-sonz requested a review from tgargula April 8, 2022 16:22
Comment on lines +7 to +9
push:
paths:
- "bode/**"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think every push means also running after pushing from local -- it may be doubled and unnecessary. Wdyt?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, this way you can see if CI is passing without creating a PR, the feedback loop is a bit shorter. I think we can leave it like that, merge, observe if we have redundant workflow runs and then adjust accordingly if needed

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

ok

@john-sonz john-sonz requested a review from tgargula April 8, 2022 21:03
Copy link
Contributor

@tgargula tgargula left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

<3

@john-sonz john-sonz merged commit 4f07fce into develop Apr 9, 2022
@john-sonz john-sonz deleted the feature/ITG-79/setup-ci branch April 9, 2022 11:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants