Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

[Feat] [trust marks] a better generalization for dynamic claims in trust marks templates #2

Open
peppelinux opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Open

[Feat] [trust marks] a better generalization for dynamic claims in trust marks templates #2

peppelinux opened this issue Feb 11, 2022 · 0 comments
Assignees
@peppelinux
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@peppelinux
Copy link
Member

We're considering the requirement to improve the mechanism to mint new trust marks with more dynamic claim then these:
https://github.com/peppelinux/spid-cie-oidc-django/blob/49649c2117ecd8fab2dda0bc7a9397030a996795/spid_cie_oidc/onboarding/models.py#L231

we must consider also to have exp claim dynamically defined (this is an easy win)
@peppelinux peppelinux self-assigned this Feb 17, 2022
@peppelinux peppelinux added the enhancement New feature or request label Feb 25, 2022
@peppelinux peppelinux changed the title feat: [trust marks] a better generalization for dynamic claims in trust marks templates [Feat] [trust marks] a better generalization for dynamic claims in trust marks templates Feb 27, 2022
@peppelinux peppelinux added this to the 0.6.0 milestone Mar 16, 2022
@peppelinux peppelinux removed this from the 0.6.0 milestone Mar 29, 2022
peppelinux pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jul 8, 2023
@rglauco
Merge pull request #2 from rglauco/refresh_token_interface
a4ab5ca 
Refresh token interface
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@peppelinux peppelinux

Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
1 participant
@peppelinux