Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

insisting on the importance of using the description field #16

Open
Bonnarel opened this issue Oct 18, 2019 · 2 comments
Open

insisting on the importance of using the description field #16

Bonnarel opened this issue Oct 18, 2019 · 2 comments

Comments

@Bonnarel
Copy link
Contributor

@Bonnarel Bonnarel commented Oct 18, 2019

The description field may be a way for human readers to distinguish between links sharing the same semantic tag and content-type. the "should" is replaced by a more suggesting "SHOULD". Tackled in pull request #18

pdowler added a commit that referenced this issue Nov 17, 2019
changes in section 3
@mbtaylor

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Member

@mbtaylor mbtaylor commented Nov 23, 2019

I don't object to the change, but note that in the Conformance-related definitions section at the head of the document, it expicitly says "(in upper or lower case)" about usage of terms like SHOULD, so the meaning of the text is not changed by this edit.

@Bonnarel

This comment has been minimized.

Copy link
Contributor Author

@Bonnarel Bonnarel commented Nov 25, 2019

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
2 participants
You can’t perform that action at this time.