Add fetchOne(RecordMapper) shortcut method to ResultQuery

[lpireyn]

No description provided.

[lukaseder]

Thanks for the suggestion.

As we're dual-licensing jOOQ, we need to ensure that rights to non-trivial contributions are properly transferred before I can look into merging your pull request:
http://www.jooq.org/legal/contributions

If you're OK with such an agreement, please e-sign the above document. If not, that's perfectly fine. We can simply implement suggestions as well...

[lpireyn]

If I sign the agreement, do you guarantee that my personal informations
(e.g. address) will never be used or transmitted?

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 10:56 AM, Lukas Eder notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thanks for the suggestion.

As we're dual-licensing jOOQ, we need to ensure that rights to non-trivial
contributions are properly transferred before I can look into merging your
pull request:
http://www.jooq.org/legal/contributions

If you're OK with such an agreement, please e-sign the above document. If
not, that's perfectly fine. We can simply implement suggestions as well...

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3810 (comment).

Laurent Pireyn
Pi Solutions

[lukaseder]

Yes, we guarantee that we will not use or transmit your personal information. We only need this information to identify you or the legal entity you represent in the context of this agreement.

[lpireyn]

Thanks. I signed the agreement.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 11:48 AM, Lukas Eder notifications@github.com
wrote:

Yes, we guarantee that we will not use or transmit your personal
information. We only need this information to identify you or the legal
entity you represent in the context of this agreement.

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3810 (comment).

Laurent Pireyn
Pi Solutions

[lukaseder]

Thank you very much, and thanks again for the useful contribution

[lpireyn]

You're welcome. Thanks for jOOQ which is an amazing lib!

Are you interested in pull requests that would be optimizations across all
classes? E.g. Replace single-character strings with characters in
concatenations. Let me know ;-)

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:06 PM, Lukas Eder notifications@github.com
wrote:

Thank you very much, and thanks again for the useful contribution

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3810 (comment).

Laurent Pireyn
Pi Solutions

[lukaseder]

Are you interested in pull requests that would be optimizations across all
classes?

Of course!

E.g. Replace single-character strings with characters in
concatenations.

Well, that would be a bit of work. Is the gain really significant?

[lpireyn]

I work with IntelliJ, and it can automatically fix these issues in one
click.

These are obviously tiny optimizations, and the gain is probably
unnoticeable. That's why I'm asking you if you think it's worth a commit.

On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 12:42 PM, Lukas Eder notifications@github.com
wrote:

Are you interested in pull requests that would be optimizations across all
classes?

Of course!

E.g. Replace single-character strings with characters in
concatenations.

Well, that would be a bit of work. Is the gain really significant?

—
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#3810 (comment).

Laurent Pireyn
Pi Solutions

[lukaseder]

The problem with pull requests to the jOOQ Open Source edition is that we have to merge them back to the "master" repository - the commercial jOOQ edition. I have an IntelliJ license as well, so if you can give me a pointer, I'd prefer to do this particular change myself...

I think it's a thing worth pursuing as jOOQ is used at a very low level of client applications and thus might have a lot of impact - even if its just a sub-percent optimisation.

[lukaseder]

Btw: Let's continue discussing this issue over here: #3816 :-)