Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

No need to sign JARs using maven-jarsigner-plugin #466

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 9, 2016
Merged

Conversation

Godin
Copy link
Member

@Godin Godin commented Dec 3, 2016

The primary use case for signing JaCoCo artifacts was the EclEmma plugin. Next release of EclEmma under Eclipse Foundation umbrella will use JaCoCo bundles from Eclipse Orbit, which signed by eclipse.org anyway. So that no need to sign anymore during our releases.

Initial discussion: https://groups.google.com/d/msg/jacoco-dev/hTLvWPXqaUg/fKoDA3zqBAAJ

@Godin Godin added this to the 0.7.8 milestone Nov 19, 2016
@Godin Godin self-assigned this Nov 19, 2016
@marchof
Copy link
Member

marchof commented Dec 5, 2016

@Godin I found more occurences for signing which probably should be removed:

  • jacoco/pom.xml (jarsigner.skip property)
  • org.jacoco.agent.rt/pom.xml (jarsigner.skip property)

As discussed on ML: We mention this in changes.html

@Godin
Copy link
Member Author

Godin commented Dec 6, 2016

@marchof should be fine now

@Godin Godin requested a review from marchof December 7, 2016 23:23
@@ -48,6 +48,12 @@
(GitHub <a href="https://github.com/jacoco/jacoco/issues/427">#427</a>).</li>
</ul>

<h3>Non-functional Changes</h3>
<ul>
<li>Stop signing release JARs
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

From the user's POV shouldn't that read: "Released JaCoCo JARs are not signed any more. Signed versions of JaCoCo are now available from the Eclipse Orbit project".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

indeed, fixed

@Godin Godin requested a review from marchof December 9, 2016 17:39
@marchof marchof merged commit 52284d1 into master Dec 9, 2016
@marchof marchof deleted the issue-466 branch December 9, 2016 22:37
@jacoco jacoco locked and limited conversation to collaborators Jan 11, 2017
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants