Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Format "Trace JSON" #199

Closed
pavolloffay opened this issue Mar 19, 2018 · 5 comments
Closed

Format "Trace JSON" #199

pavolloffay opened this issue Mar 19, 2018 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@pavolloffay
Copy link
Member

Format "Trace JSON" output so the output is nicely readable.

@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

I just use a browser plugin for formatting

@tiffon
Copy link
Member

tiffon commented Mar 23, 2018

I also use a browser plugin for this.

https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/json-handle/iahnhfdhidomcpggpaimmmahffihkfnj

Also, the UI is not able to achieve this as the JSON is not presented in the UI. This falls to the query-service.

New ticket: jaegertracing/jaeger#756

@tiffon tiffon closed this as completed Mar 23, 2018
@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

@tiffon the server side change landed, if you add ?prettyPrint=true to the trace url the backend will format it.

@yurishkuro yurishkuro reopened this Apr 4, 2018
@ghost ghost assigned tiffon Apr 4, 2018
@ghost ghost added the review label Apr 4, 2018
@ghost ghost removed the review label Apr 4, 2018
@yurishkuro yurishkuro reopened this Apr 20, 2018
@tiffon tiffon closed this as completed Apr 20, 2018
@tiffon
Copy link
Member

tiffon commented Apr 20, 2018

Is this not working? Is prertyPrint=true the wrong flag?

https://github.com/jaegertracing/jaeger-ui/blob/master/src/components/TracePage/TracePageHeader.js#L114

@tiffon tiffon reopened this Apr 20, 2018
@yurishkuro
Copy link
Member

oh, damn, I missed that it was merged. Too late, 1.4.0 is out already.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants