Fix SPM make build

[yurishkuro]

Which problem is this PR solving?

• SPM Makefile was calling a target that was removed in previous refactoring

Description of the changes

• Build the image directly instead of calling much more expensive target
• Change crossdock target to not build debug image with devle, which is expensive

How was this change tested?

• make build && make dev

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 54.11%. Comparing base (1c1f22b) to head (98a63af).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #5662       +/-   ##
===========================================
- Coverage   96.37%   54.11%   -42.26%     
===========================================
  Files         327      163      -164     
  Lines       16028     8413     -7615     
===========================================
- Hits        15447     4553    -10894     
- Misses        404     3415     +3011     
- Partials      177      445      +268     

Flag	Coverage Δ
badger_v1	8.04% <ø> (ø)
badger_v2	1.92% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
cassandra-3.x-v1	16.60% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-3.x-v2	1.84% <ø> (-0.01%)	⬇️
cassandra-4.x-v1	16.60% <ø> (ø)
cassandra-4.x-v2	?
elasticsearch-7.x-v1	?
elasticsearch-8.x-v1	19.05% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
elasticsearch-8.x-v2	19.06% <ø> (ø)
grpc_v1	9.46% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
grpc_v2	?
kafka	9.76% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-1.x-v1	18.91% <ø> (-0.02%)	⬇️
opensearch-2.x-v1	18.92% <ø> (ø)
opensearch-2.x-v2	18.92% <ø> (+0.01%)	⬆️
unittests	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.