Draft changes for packaging/deployment/lifecycle. #540
Conversation
|
I have to finish the extension API changes and submit a PR. After that, I can take over this PR, if you don't get to it sooner. Your call, I don't mind either way. |
|
@Ladicek PR updated; I have marked most conversations as resolved, few are still open or semi-open. |
|
3 references to |
|
Addressed two of those links which were incorrect even before but were highlighted by the rename. The last one you pointed out is IMO correct. I also changed the wording in @Ladicek I will leave this as a draft for you to build up on for #484 if that's ok. |
|
OK cool, thanks! |
| @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ | |||
|
|
|||
| In addition to rules defined in <<selection>>, the following rules apply. | |||
|
|
|||
| An alternative is not available for injection, lookup or name resolution to classes in a module unless the module is a bean archive and the alternative is explicitly _selected_ for the bean archive or the application. | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think this sentence needs to be added back. I'll do it locally, just FYI.
|
I'm closing this, because it's superseded by #546. |
Fixes #483
@Ladicek this is the draft I started around #483. It has TODOs in places where I think we will need mentions and links to build compatible extensions.
I know you wanted to write down the extension part so I thought you could (once we agree on this part) take this draft as a basis for #484. If you think it is better written all together, then we can close this PR.