Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

The published version, at least application.xsd is missing the concurrency elements #38

Closed
pzygielo opened this issue Jun 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Closed

The published version, at least application.xsd is missing the concurrency elements #38

pzygielo opened this issue Jun 13, 2022 · 4 comments
Assignees
@starksm64

Comments

@pzygielo
Copy link

The published version, at least application.xsd is missing the concurrency elements.

Originally posted by @arjantijms in eclipse-ee4j/glassfish#23989 (comment)
@pzygielo pzygielo changed the title The published version, at least application.xsd is missing the concurrency elements. The published version, at least application.xsd is missing the concurrency elements Jun 13, 2022
@starksm64
Copy link
Contributor

Is someone on the concurrency team providing an update?

the repository containing the schema is https://github.com/jakartaee/jakarta.ee with the path to the file being static/xml/ns/jakartaee/application_10.xsd.

@pzygielo
Copy link
Author

With

taken it's probably the matter to generate correct XSDs and update drafts published at https://jakarta.ee/xml/ns/jakartaee/#10.

@starksm64 starksm64 self-assigned this Jun 13, 2022
@starksm64
Copy link
Contributor

Ok, I'll look at that

@pzygielo pzygielo mentioned this issue Jun 13, 2022
Merged
@starksm64 starksm64 mentioned this issue Jun 13, 2022
Merged
@starksm64
Copy link
Contributor

the changes have been added to the jakartaee/jakarta.ee#1472 PR

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@starksm64 starksm64

Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@starksm64 @pzygielo