-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Jakarta Interceptors 2.0 #233
Conversation
Signed-off-by: arjantijms <arjan.tijms@gmail.com>
Note that Interceptors doesn't have its own TCK, but piggybacks on the platform TCK. |
Deploy preview for jakartaee-specifications ready! Built with commit 5e5a4de https://deploy-preview-233--jakartaee-specifications.netlify.app |
Assigning @kazumura as the Mentor for this Spec PR. |
Spec Review Checklist
|
Tagging with "Platform" to indicate it's dependency on the Platform TCK. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM. Thanks, @arjantijms
Thanks @kazumura for the extra pair of eyes! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Looks good! Thanks, @arjantijms
There is one mention to It should be jakarta.xml.rpc.handler.MessageContext |
Thanks! I've just updated it, and will now re-stage the API and update the javadocs in the PR. |
Signed-off-by: arjantijms <arjan.tijms@gmail.com>
@arjantijms must this be updated somehow? Just trying to understand the workflows :) |
@hendrikebbers yes indeed. This is easiest for myself todo. It's essentially running I'll do it now, though if you wanted to do it, the easiest way would be to checkout my PR branch and then do a PR against that. |
By @hendrikebbers Signed-off-by: arjantijms <arjan.tijms@gmail.com>
Updated PR: d01e6bf |
Signed-off-by: arjantijms <arjan.tijms@gmail.com>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Minor javadoc issue pointing to non-existent jakarta.xml.rpc
API
PR available jakartaee/interceptors#79
FYI, the RC1 Platform TCK link is https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee9-eftl/promoted/jakarta-jakartaeetck-9.0.0-RC1.zip which has the same SHA We also passed the Web Profile tests as well!. This testing was done with https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/glassfish/glassfish-6.0.0-RC2.zip. |
Ballot thread: https://eclipse.org/lists/jakarta.ee-spec/msg01261.html |
Per the discussion on our Spec Committee call on 11/11, I updated the reference to the EFTL TCK in the top level comment to be this: https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee9-eftl/promoted/jakarta-jakartaeetck-9.0.0.zip. I based this update on the CCR and TCK Results which both referenced the "-RC1" version of the TCK. This type of update was acceptable and expected by the Spec Committee. |
|
Add minutes for aug 11 Platform call
Signed-off-by: arjantijms arjan.tijms@gmail.com
Specification PR template
When creating a specification project release review, create PRs with the content defined as follows.
Include the following in the PR:
https://github.com/jakartaee/specification-committee/blob/master/spec_page_template.md
The TCK users guide MUST include the instructions to run the compatible implementations used to validate the release.
Instructions MAY be by reference.
https://jakarta.oss.sonatype.org/content/repositories/staging/jakarta/interceptor/jakarta.interceptor-api/2.0.0/
https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/jakartaee9-eftl/promoted/jakarta-jakartaeetck-9.0.0.zip
Compatibility certification request for EE4J implementation of Jakarta Interceptors 2.0 interceptors#71
If desired, an optional second PR can be created to contain just the JavaDoc in the
apidocs
directory.