[ISSUE-172] Implement the new datetime format functionality #174
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
jama5262
commented
Dec 30, 2022
Comment on lines
-90
to
+95
| Pattern _matchesOrdinalDates(List<String> ordinals) { | ||
| return RegExp(r'(?<=[0-9])(?:' + ordinals.join('|') + ')'); | ||
| String _matchesOrdinalDates(String input, List<String> ordinals) { | ||
| final matches = | ||
| RegExp(r'\d+\s*(' + ordinals.join('|') + ')').allMatches(input); | ||
| return matches.isNotEmpty ? matches.first.group(1) ?? '' : ''; |
jama5262
deleted the
ISSUE-172_worki_on_implementing_the_format_functionailty
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What does this PR do?
Implement the new datetime format functionality
Resolves #172
Resolves #72