Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Start using Redux #136

Closed
mitchhentges opened this issue Feb 15, 2016 · 7 comments
Closed

Start using Redux #136

mitchhentges opened this issue Feb 15, 2016 · 7 comments
Assignees

Comments

@mitchhentges
Copy link
Member

See the Flux GitHub project

@mitchhentges
Copy link
Member Author

Aww snap, GitHub assignees! What up

@ddneat
Copy link
Member

ddneat commented Feb 19, 2016

Maybe http://redux.js.org/ might be also an option. What are your opinions?

@mitchhentges
Copy link
Member Author

I'm personally indifferent. In our Matrix channel discussions, it seems like Redux is the better one.
I haven't used either, but I know that we need something, because data-passing-around is pretty sad right now in James

@kokarn
Copy link
Contributor

kokarn commented Feb 19, 2016

Tried Flux, Redux and Reflux. Would go with Redux today.

On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 4:38 PM Mitchell Hentges notifications@github.com
wrote:

I'm personally indifferent. In our Matrix channel
https://vector.im/beta/#/room/%23james:matrix.org discussions, it seems
like Redux is the better one.
I haven't used either, but I know that we need something, because
data-passing-around is pretty sad right now in James


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#136 (comment).

@tomitm
Copy link
Contributor

tomitm commented Feb 20, 2016

Redux is what I originally had in mind, as it keeps thing simple. I'm working on a prototype app for something at the moment to get the hang of it.

proxy will probably need some refactoring (immutability) if we want to put requests in the Redux store. Shouldn't be too bad.

@tomitm tomitm changed the title Start using Flux Start using Redux Feb 20, 2016
@tomitm
Copy link
Contributor

tomitm commented Jun 4, 2016

This is just about completed under #183, if anyone is interested in taking a look!

@tomitm
Copy link
Contributor

tomitm commented Sep 5, 2016

Completed in #183! 😃

@tomitm tomitm closed this as completed Sep 5, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants