Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

upgrading jest to 29.7.0 #131

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Sep 27, 2023
Merged

upgrading jest to 29.7.0 #131

merged 1 commit into from Sep 27, 2023

Conversation

jaredwray
Copy link
Owner

@jaredwray jaredwray commented Sep 27, 2023

Please check if the PR fulfills these requirements

  • Followed the Contributing guidelines.
  • Tests for the changes have been added (for bug fixes/features) with 100% code coverage.
  • Docs have been added / updated (for bug fixes / features)

What kind of change does this PR introduce? (Bug fix, feature, docs update, ...)
upgrading jest to 29.7.0

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 27, 2023

Codecov Report

All modified lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (2ed723b) 100.00% compared to head (2972a65) 100.00%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #131   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            9         9           
  Lines          277       277           
  Branches        43        43           
=========================================
  Hits           277       277           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jaredwray jaredwray merged commit 45fe2fa into main Sep 27, 2023
7 checks passed
@jaredwray jaredwray deleted the upgrading-jest-to-29.7.0 branch September 27, 2023 15:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant