/
assignment.coffee
333 lines (276 loc) · 7.43 KB
/
assignment.coffee
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
45
46
47
48
49
50
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
66
67
68
69
70
71
72
73
74
75
76
77
78
79
80
81
82
83
84
85
86
87
88
89
90
91
92
93
94
95
96
97
98
99
100
101
102
103
104
105
106
107
108
109
110
111
112
113
114
115
116
117
118
119
120
121
122
123
124
125
126
127
128
129
130
131
132
133
134
135
136
137
138
139
140
141
142
143
144
145
146
147
148
149
150
151
152
153
154
155
156
157
158
159
160
161
162
163
164
165
166
167
168
169
170
171
172
173
174
175
176
177
178
179
180
181
182
183
184
185
186
187
188
189
190
191
192
193
194
195
196
197
198
199
200
201
202
203
204
205
206
207
208
209
210
211
212
213
214
215
216
217
218
219
220
221
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
234
235
236
237
238
239
240
241
242
243
244
245
246
247
248
249
250
251
252
253
254
255
256
257
258
259
260
261
262
263
264
265
266
267
268
269
270
271
272
273
274
275
276
277
278
279
280
281
282
283
284
285
286
287
288
289
290
291
292
293
294
295
296
297
298
299
300
301
302
303
304
305
306
307
308
309
310
311
312
313
314
315
316
317
318
319
320
321
322
323
324
325
326
327
328
329
330
331
332
333
# Assignment
# ----------
# * Assignment
# * Compound Assignment
# * Destructuring Assignment
# * Context Property (@) Assignment
# * Existential Assignment (?=)
test "context property assignment (using @)", ->
nonce = {}
addMethod = ->
@method = -> nonce
this
eq nonce, addMethod.call({}).method()
test "unassignable values", ->
nonce = {}
for nonref in ['', '""', '0', 'f()'].concat CoffeeScript.RESERVED
eq nonce, (try CoffeeScript.compile "#{nonref} = v" catch e then nonce)
test "compound assignments should not declare", ->
# TODO: make description more clear
# TODO: remove reference to Math
eq Math, (-> Math or= 0)()
# Compound Assignment
test "boolean operators", ->
nonce = {}
a = 0
a or= nonce
eq nonce, a
b = 1
b or= nonce
eq 1, b
c = 0
c and= nonce
eq 0, c
d = 1
d and= nonce
eq nonce, d
# ensure that RHS is treated as a group
e = f = false
e and= f or true
eq false, e
test "compound assignment as a sub expression", ->
[a, b, c] = [1, 2, 3]
eq 6, (a + b += c)
eq 1, a
eq 5, b
eq 3, c
# *note: this test could still use refactoring*
test "compound assignment should be careful about caching variables", ->
count = 0
list = []
list[++count] or= 1
eq 1, list[1]
eq 1, count
list[++count] ?= 2
eq 2, list[2]
eq 2, count
list[count++] and= 6
eq 6, list[2]
eq 3, count
base = ->
++count
base
base().four or= 4
eq 4, base.four
eq 4, count
base().five ?= 5
eq 5, base.five
eq 5, count
test "compound assignment with implicit objects", ->
obj = undefined
obj ?=
one: 1
eq 1, obj.one
obj and=
two: 2
eq undefined, obj.one
eq 2, obj.two
test "compound assignment (math operators)", ->
num = 10
num -= 5
eq 5, num
num *= 10
eq 50, num
num /= 10
eq 5, num
num %= 3
eq 2, num
test "more compound assignment", ->
a = {}
val = undefined
val ||= a
val ||= true
eq a, val
b = {}
val &&= true
eq val, true
val &&= b
eq b, val
c = {}
val = null
val ?= c
val ?= true
eq c, val
# Destructuring Assignment
test "empty destructuring assignment", ->
{} = [] = undefined
test "chained destructuring assignments", ->
[a] = {0: b} = {'0': c} = [nonce={}]
eq nonce, a
eq nonce, b
eq nonce, c
test "variable swapping to verify caching of RHS values when appropriate", ->
a = nonceA = {}
b = nonceB = {}
c = nonceC = {}
[a, b, c] = [b, c, a]
eq nonceB, a
eq nonceC, b
eq nonceA, c
[a, b, c] = [b, c, a]
eq nonceC, a
eq nonceA, b
eq nonceB, c
fn = ->
[a, b, c] = [b, c, a]
arrayEq [nonceA,nonceB,nonceC], fn()
eq nonceA, a
eq nonceB, b
eq nonceC, c
test "#713", ->
nonces = [nonceA={},nonceB={}]
eq nonces, [a, b] = [c, d] = nonces
eq nonceA, a
eq nonceA, c
eq nonceB, b
eq nonceB, d
test "destructuring assignment with splats", ->
a = {}; b = {}; c = {}; d = {}; e = {}
[x,y...,z] = [a,b,c,d,e]
eq a, x
arrayEq [b,c,d], y
eq e, z
test "deep destructuring assignment with splats", ->
a={}; b={}; c={}; d={}; e={}; f={}; g={}; h={}; i={}
[u, [v, w..., x], y..., z] = [a, [b, c, d, e], f, g, h, i]
eq a, u
eq b, v
arrayEq [c,d], w
eq e, x
arrayEq [f,g,h], y
eq i, z
test "destructuring assignment with objects", ->
a={}; b={}; c={}
obj = {a,b,c}
{a:x, b:y, c:z} = obj
eq a, x
eq b, y
eq c, z
test "deep destructuring assignment with objects", ->
a={}; b={}; c={}; d={}
obj = {
a
b: {
'c': {
d: [
b
{e: c, f: d}
]
}
}
}
{a: w, 'b': {c: d: [x, {'f': z, e: y}]}} = obj
eq a, w
eq b, x
eq c, y
eq d, z
test "destructuring assignment with objects and splats", ->
a={}; b={}; c={}; d={}
obj = a: b: [a, b, c, d]
{a: b: [y, z...]} = obj
eq a, y
arrayEq [b,c,d], z
test "destructuring assignment against an expression", ->
a={}; b={}
[y, z] = if true then [a, b] else [b, a]
eq a, y
eq b, z
test "bracket insertion when necessary", ->
[a] = [0] ? [1]
eq a, 0
# for implicit destructuring assignment in comprehensions, see the comprehension tests
test "destructuring assignment with context (@) properties", ->
a={}; b={}; c={}; d={}; e={}
obj =
fn: () ->
local = [a, {b, c}, d, e]
[@a, {b: @b, c: @c}, @d, @e] = local
eq undefined, obj[key] for key in ['a','b','c','d','e']
obj.fn()
eq a, obj.a
eq b, obj.b
eq c, obj.c
eq d, obj.d
eq e, obj.e
test "#1024", ->
eq 2 * [] = 3 + 5, 16
test "#1005: invalid identifiers allowed on LHS of destructuring assignment", ->
disallowed = ['eval', 'arguments'].concat CoffeeScript.RESERVED
throws (-> CoffeeScript.compile "[#{disallowed.join ', '}] = x"), null, 'all disallowed'
throws (-> CoffeeScript.compile "[#{disallowed.join '..., '}...] = x"), null, 'all disallowed as splats'
t = tSplat = null
for v in disallowed when v isnt 'class' # `class` by itself is an expression
throws (-> CoffeeScript.compile t), null, t = "[#{v}] = x"
throws (-> CoffeeScript.compile tSplat), null, tSplat = "[#{v}...] = x"
doesNotThrow ->
for v in disallowed
CoffeeScript.compile "[a.#{v}] = x"
CoffeeScript.compile "[a.#{v}...] = x"
CoffeeScript.compile "[@#{v}] = x"
CoffeeScript.compile "[@#{v}...] = x"
# Existential Assignment
test "existential assignment", ->
nonce = {}
a = false
a ?= nonce
eq false, a
b = undefined
b ?= nonce
eq nonce, b
c = null
c ?= nonce
eq nonce, c
d ?= nonce
eq nonce, d
test "#1348, #1216: existential assignment compilation", ->
nonce = {}
a = nonce
b = (a ?= 0)
eq nonce, b
#the first ?= compiles into a statement; the second ?= compiles to a ternary expression
eq a ?= b ?= 1, nonce
e ?= f ?= g ?= 1
eq e + g, 2
#need to ensure the two vars are not defined, hence the strange names;
# broke earlier when using c ?= d ?= 1 because `d` is declared elsewhere
eq und1_1348 ?= und2_1348 ?= 1, 1
if a then a ?= 2 else a = 3
eq a, nonce
test "#1591, #1101: splatted expressions in destructuring assignment must be assignable", ->
nonce = {}
for nonref in ['', '""', '0', 'f()', '(->)'].concat CoffeeScript.RESERVED
eq nonce, (try CoffeeScript.compile "[#{nonref}...] = v" catch e then nonce)
test "#1643: splatted accesses in destructuring assignments should not be declared as variables", ->
nonce = {}
accesses = ['o.a', 'o["a"]', '(o.a)', '(o.a).a', '@o.a', 'C::a', 'C::', 'f().a', 'o?.a', 'o?.a.b', 'f?().a']
for access in accesses
for i,j in [1,2,3] #position can matter
code =
"""
nonce = {}; nonce2 = {}; nonce3 = {};
@o = o = new (class C then a:{}); f = -> o
[#{new Array(i).join('x,')}#{access}...] = [#{new Array(i).join('0,')}nonce, nonce2, nonce3]
unless #{access}[0] is nonce and #{access}[1] is nonce2 and #{access}[2] is nonce3 then throw new Error('[...]')
"""
eq nonce, unless (try CoffeeScript.run code, bare: true catch e then true) then nonce
# subpatterns like `[[a]...]` and `[{a}...]`
subpatterns = ['[sub, sub2, sub3]', '{0: sub, 1: sub2, 2: sub3}']
for subpattern in subpatterns
for i,j in [1,2,3]
code =
"""
nonce = {}; nonce2 = {}; nonce3 = {};
[#{new Array(i).join('x,')}#{subpattern}...] = [#{new Array(i).join('0,')}nonce, nonce2, nonce3]
unless sub is nonce and sub2 is nonce2 and sub3 is nonce3 then throw new Error('[sub...]')
"""
eq nonce, unless (try CoffeeScript.run code, bare: true catch e then true) then nonce