You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When fitting a CFA with "Model Options -> Include mean structure" activated, JASP includes a table with the indicator intercepts, but not the factor means.
On a related note, it is unclear whether JASP fixes the factor means or some indicator intercepts to zero for identification. It seems to be the former, regardless of how the covariance structure is identified.
Expected Behaviour
Ideally, there would be a table with factor means, after the intercepts table.
When, under "Model identification", selecting...
Factor variances, the mean structure should be identified by fixing factor means to zero.
Marker variable, the mean structure should be identified by fixing indicator intercepts to zero.
Effects coding [Thanks for adding this feature!], the mean structure should be identified by constraining indicator intercepts to average to zero.
Steps to Reproduce
Specify a two factor CFA, using the Political Democracy dataset
Select "Model Options -> Include mean structure" and "Model identification: Marker variable"
No Table with factor means available.
Log (if any)
No response
Final Checklist
I have included a screenshot showcasing the issue, if possible.
I have included a JASP file (zipped) or data file that causes the crash/bug, if applicable.
I have accurately described the bug, and steps to reproduce it.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
@HeikoBreitsohl, thanks for taking the time to create this issue. If possible (and applicable), please upload to the issue website (#2223) a screenshot showcasing the problem, and/or a compressed (zipped) .jasp file or the data file that causes the issue. If you would prefer not to make your data publicly available, you can send your file(s) directly to us, issues@jasp-stats.org
@HeikoBreitsohlm thanks for creating this issue. You are right, by default the latent intercepts are fixed to 0. And so far there is no option to change it. I think it makes sense to add this as an option underneath the include mean structure options such as:
juliuspfadt
changed the title
[Bug]: CFA module does not include factor means in the output
[Feature Request]: Option to fix intercepts to zero in mean structure
Jul 14, 2023
@juliuspfadt Thanks for the swift response! This looks great!
Would it be possible to add a third option that corresponds to effects coding?
That could be called something like "Constrain manifest intercepts to average to zero".
Hi @HeikoBreitsohl, sorry for the late response. Regular work has kept me busy. Do you mean the intercepts of the manifest variables per latent variable should average to zero? That is easy to implement.
JASP Version
0.17.2.1
Commit ID
No response
JASP Module
Factor
What analysis are you seeing the problem on?
CFA with mean structure
What OS are you seeing the problem on?
Windows 10
Bug Description
When fitting a CFA with "Model Options -> Include mean structure" activated, JASP includes a table with the indicator intercepts, but not the factor means.
On a related note, it is unclear whether JASP fixes the factor means or some indicator intercepts to zero for identification. It seems to be the former, regardless of how the covariance structure is identified.
Expected Behaviour
Ideally, there would be a table with factor means, after the intercepts table.
When, under "Model identification", selecting...
Steps to Reproduce
Log (if any)
No response
Final Checklist
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: